Demographics details for Haskell, TX vs Fulton, MO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Haskell, TX vs Fulton, MO.
| Data | Haskell | Fulton |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 5,403 | 12,710 |
| Median Age | 44.3 years | 33.9 years |
| Median Income | $52,786 | $59,544 |
| Married Families | 41.0% | 29.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Haskell vs Fulton
- The population in Fulton is higher at 12,710, compared to 5,403 in Haskell.
- Residents in Haskell have a higher median age of 44.3 years compared to 33.9 years in Fulton.
- Fulton has a higher median income of $59,544, compared to $52,786 in Haskell.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Haskell at 41.0% compared to 29.0% in Fulton.
- The poverty level is higher in Fulton at 10%, compared to 0% in Haskell.
- Fulton has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 4.0% in Haskell.
Demographics
Demographics Haskell vs Fulton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Haskell | Fulton |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 6 | 9 |
| White | 58 | 86 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 29 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 2 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Haskell vs Fulton
- In Fulton, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 9% compared to 6% in Haskell.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Fulton at 86% compared to 58% in Haskell.
- Both Haskell and Fulton have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Haskell at 29% compared to 3% in Fulton.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Haskell at 7% compared to 2% in Fulton.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Haskell and Fulton at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Haskell | Fulton |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.4% | 18.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.9% | 13.9% |
| Depression | 23.6% | 24.3% |
| Smoking | 20.7% | 24.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.9% | 17.1% |
| Obesity | 38.6% | 39.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 21.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Haskell vs Fulton
- In Fulton, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.5% compared to 18.4% in Haskell.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Fulton at 24.3% versus 23.6% in Haskell.
- Fulton has a higher smoking rate at 24.7% compared to 20.7% in Haskell.
- Binge drinking is more common in Haskell at 17.9% compared to 17.1% in Fulton.
- Fulton has higher obesity rates at 39.9% compared to 38.6% in Haskell.
- Disability percentages are higher in Haskell at 21.0% compared to 11.0% in Fulton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Haskell | Fulton |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.8% (98) | 0.0% (3) |
| High School Diploma | 18.8% (1,018) | 16.3% (2,077) |
| Less than High School | 28.9% (1,561) | 16.9% (2,154) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.8% (799) | 14.7% (1,867) |
Education Levels Comparison: Haskell vs Fulton
- A higher percentage of residents in Haskell have no formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 0.0% in Fulton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Haskell hold a high school diploma at 18.8% compared to 16.3% in Fulton.
- More residents in Haskell have less than a high school education at 28.9% compared to 16.9% in Fulton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Haskell hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.8% compared to 14.7% in Fulton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.