Demographics details for Harrison, NJ vs Fairborn, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Harrison, NJ vs Fairborn, OH.
| Data | Harrison | Fairborn |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 19,801 | 34,977 |
| Median Age | 33.7 years | 35.1 years |
| Median Income | $72,773 | $53,783 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 33.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 5.1 |
Population Comparison: Harrison vs Fairborn
- The population in Fairborn is higher at 34,977, compared to 19,801 in Harrison.
- The median age in Fairborn is higher at 35.1 years, compared to 33.7 years in Harrison.
- Harrison has a higher median income of $72,773 compared to $53,783 in Fairborn.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Harrison at 39.0% compared to 33.0% in Fairborn.
- Harrison has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 9% in Fairborn.
- Fairborn has a higher unemployment rate at 5.1% compared to 4.5% in Harrison.
Demographics
Demographics Harrison vs Fairborn provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Harrison | Fairborn |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 6 | 9 |
| White | 13 | 78 |
| Asian | 19 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 45 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 15 | 8 |
| American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Harrison vs Fairborn
- In Fairborn, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 9% compared to 6% in Harrison.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Fairborn at 78% compared to 13% in Harrison.
- The Asian population is larger in Harrison at 19% compared to 1% in Fairborn.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Harrison at 45% compared to 4% in Fairborn.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Harrison at 15% compared to 8% in Fairborn.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Harrison at 2% compared to 0% in Fairborn.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Harrison | Fairborn |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.8% | 18.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.8% | 12.4% |
| Depression | 17.5% | 23.4% |
| Smoking | 12.7% | 20.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.5% | 16.3% |
| Obesity | 24.7% | 39.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 6.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Harrison vs Fairborn
- In Fairborn, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 13.8% in Harrison.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Fairborn at 23.4% versus 17.5% in Harrison.
- Fairborn has a higher smoking rate at 20.5% compared to 12.7% in Harrison.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Fairborn at 16.3% compared to 15.5% in Harrison.
- Fairborn has higher obesity rates at 39.7% compared to 24.7% in Harrison.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Fairborn at 16.0% compared to 6.0% in Harrison.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Harrison | Fairborn |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.3% (248) | 0.3% (116) |
| High School Diploma | 16.5% (3,268) | 13.2% (4,620) |
| Less than High School | 15.6% (3,092) | 12.5% (4,382) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 33.4% (6,606) | 19.4% (6,782) |
Education Levels Comparison: Harrison vs Fairborn
- A higher percentage of residents in Harrison have no formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.3% in Fairborn.
- A higher percentage of residents in Harrison hold a high school diploma at 16.5% compared to 13.2% in Fairborn.
- More residents in Harrison have less than a high school education at 15.6% compared to 12.5% in Fairborn.
- A higher percentage of residents in Harrison hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 33.4% compared to 19.4% in Fairborn.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.