Demographics details for Harlem, MT vs Provo, UT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Harlem, MT vs Provo, UT.
| Data | Harlem | Provo |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 762 | 113,523 |
| Median Age | 33.3 years | 23.6 years |
| Median Income | $61,818 | $57,943 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Harlem vs Provo
- The population in Provo is higher at 113,523, compared to 762 in Harlem.
- Residents in Harlem have a higher median age of 33.3 years compared to 23.6 years in Provo.
- Harlem has a higher median income of $61,818 compared to $57,943 in Provo.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Harlem and Provo at 36.0%.
- The poverty level is higher in Provo at 11%, compared to 10% in Harlem.
- Provo has a higher unemployment rate at 4.0% compared to 3.2% in Harlem.
Demographics
Demographics Harlem vs Provo provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Harlem | Provo |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 1 |
| White | 8 | 69 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | 10 | 18 |
| Two or More Races | 17 | 9 |
| American Indian | 65 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Harlem vs Provo
- In Provo, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Harlem.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Provo at 69% compared to 8% in Harlem.
- In Provo, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Harlem.
- Provo has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 18%, compared to 10% in Harlem.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Harlem at 17% compared to 9% in Provo.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Harlem at 65% compared to 1% in Provo.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Harlem | Provo |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.2% | 16.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.8% | 12.0% |
| Depression | 23.0% | 24.5% |
| Smoking | 22.7% | 8.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 21.8% | 7.3% |
| Obesity | 36.8% | 33.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 27.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Harlem vs Provo
- More residents in Harlem report poor mental health at 18.2% compared to 16.3% in Provo.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Provo at 24.5% versus 23.0% in Harlem.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Harlem at 22.7% compared to 8.4% in Provo.
- Binge drinking is more common in Harlem at 21.8% compared to 7.3% in Provo.
- Obesity rates are higher in Harlem at 36.8% compared to 33.5% in Provo.
- Disability percentages are higher in Harlem at 27.0% compared to 10.0% in Provo.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Harlem | Provo |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.6% (663) |
| High School Diploma | 18.6% (142) | 4.6% (5,209) |
| Less than High School | 5.8% (44) | 5.7% (6,435) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 22.3% (170) | 18.3% (20,752) |
Education Levels Comparison: Harlem vs Provo
- In Provo, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.0% in Harlem.
- A higher percentage of residents in Harlem hold a high school diploma at 18.6% compared to 4.6% in Provo.
- More residents in Harlem have less than a high school education at 5.8% compared to 5.7% in Provo.
- A higher percentage of residents in Harlem hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.3% compared to 18.3% in Provo.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.