Demographics details for Harker heights, TX vs Montgomery, IL

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Harker heights, TX vs Montgomery, IL.

Data Harker heights Montgomery
Population 34,102 21,799
Median Age 34.5 years 31.7 years
Median Income $72,258 $105,240
Married Families 35.0% 36.0%
Poverty Level 9% 5%
Unemployment Rate 5.0 3.5

Population Comparison: Harker heights vs Montgomery

  • In Harker heights, the population is higher at 34,102, compared to 21,799 in Montgomery.
  • Residents in Harker heights have a higher median age of 34.5 years compared to 31.7 years in Montgomery.
  • Montgomery has a higher median income of $105,240, compared to $72,258 in Harker heights.
  • In Montgomery, the percentage of married families is higher at 36.0%, compared to 35.0% in Harker heights.
  • Harker heights has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 5% in Montgomery.
  • The unemployment rate in Harker heights is higher at 5.0%, compared to 3.5% in Montgomery.

Demographics

Demographics Harker heights vs Montgomery provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Harker heights Montgomery
Black 28 5
White 36 52
Asian 3 1
Hispanic 21 31
Two or More Races 11 11
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Harker heights vs Montgomery

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Harker heights at 28% compared to 5% in Montgomery.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Montgomery at 52% compared to 36% in Harker heights.
  • The Asian population is larger in Harker heights at 3% compared to 1% in Montgomery.
  • Montgomery has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 31%, compared to 21% in Harker heights.
  • Both Harker heights and Montgomery have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 11%.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Harker heights at 1% compared to 0% in Montgomery.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Harker heights Montgomery
Mental Health Not Good 16.5% 14.6%
Physical Health Not Good 10.8% 10.3%
Depression 22.5% 18.8%
Smoking 15.5% 14.1%
Binge Drinking 17.1% 17.3%
Obesity 37.1% 34.4%
Disability Percentage 13.0% 4.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Harker heights vs Montgomery

  • More residents in Harker heights report poor mental health at 16.5% compared to 14.6% in Montgomery.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Harker heights at 22.5% compared to 18.8% in Montgomery.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Harker heights at 15.5% compared to 14.1% in Montgomery.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Montgomery at 17.3% compared to 17.1% in Harker heights.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Harker heights at 37.1% compared to 34.4% in Montgomery.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Harker heights at 13.0% compared to 4.0% in Montgomery.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Harker heights Montgomery
No Schooling 1.3% (448) 1.2% (255)
High School Diploma 11.6% (3,958) 15.6% (3,406)
Less than High School 10.3% (3,509) 8.2% (1,792)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 18.8% (6,403) 15.5% (3,372)

Education Levels Comparison: Harker heights vs Montgomery

  • A higher percentage of residents in Harker heights have no formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 1.2% in Montgomery.
  • In Montgomery, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.6% compared to 11.6% in Harker heights.
  • More residents in Harker heights have less than a high school education at 10.3% compared to 8.2% in Montgomery.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Harker heights hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.8% compared to 15.5% in Montgomery.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.