Demographics details for Halls, TN vs Chesapeake, VA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Halls, TN vs Chesapeake, VA.
| Data | Halls | Chesapeake |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,055 | 252,488 |
| Median Age | 36.8 years | 37.4 years |
| Median Income | $40,375 | $92,703 |
| Married Families | 30.0% | 43.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.0 |
Population Comparison: Halls vs Chesapeake
- The population in Chesapeake is higher at 252,488, compared to 2,055 in Halls.
- The median age in Chesapeake is higher at 37.4 years, compared to 36.8 years in Halls.
- Chesapeake has a higher median income of $92,703, compared to $40,375 in Halls.
- In Chesapeake, the percentage of married families is higher at 43.0%, compared to 30.0% in Halls.
- Halls has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 8% in Chesapeake.
- The unemployment rate in Halls is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.0% in Chesapeake.
Demographics
Demographics Halls vs Chesapeake provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Halls | Chesapeake |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 23 | 29 |
| White | 65 | 53 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 4 |
| Hispanic | 4 | 7 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 7 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Halls vs Chesapeake
- In Chesapeake, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 29% compared to 23% in Halls.
- Halls has a higher percentage of White residents at 65% compared to 53% in Chesapeake.
- In Chesapeake, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 0% in Halls.
- Chesapeake has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 7%, compared to 4% in Halls.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Halls at 8% compared to 7% in Chesapeake.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Halls and Chesapeake at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Halls | Chesapeake |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 22.6% | 15.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 16.8% | 10.0% |
| Depression | 29.6% | 20.9% |
| Smoking | 29.1% | 14.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.3% | 16.1% |
| Obesity | 41.4% | 36.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 24.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Halls vs Chesapeake
- More residents in Halls report poor mental health at 22.6% compared to 15.9% in Chesapeake.
- Depression is more prevalent in Halls at 29.6% compared to 20.9% in Chesapeake.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Halls at 29.1% compared to 14.8% in Chesapeake.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Chesapeake at 16.1% compared to 13.3% in Halls.
- Obesity rates are higher in Halls at 41.4% compared to 36.1% in Chesapeake.
- Disability percentages are higher in Halls at 24.0% compared to 11.0% in Chesapeake.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Halls | Chesapeake |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (5) | 0.8% (2,039) |
| High School Diploma | 25.5% (525) | 13.1% (33,024) |
| Less than High School | 14.9% (307) | 7.0% (17,684) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 6.4% (132) | 23.8% (60,160) |
Education Levels Comparison: Halls vs Chesapeake
- In Chesapeake, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.2% in Halls.
- A higher percentage of residents in Halls hold a high school diploma at 25.5% compared to 13.1% in Chesapeake.
- More residents in Halls have less than a high school education at 14.9% compared to 7.0% in Chesapeake.
- In Chesapeake, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.8% compared to 6.4% in Halls.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.