Demographics details for Grove, OK vs Fort lupton, CO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Grove, OK vs Fort lupton, CO.
| Data | Grove | Fort lupton |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 7,215 | 8,829 |
| Median Age | 46.9 years | 35.9 years |
| Median Income | $56,469 | $71,293 |
| Married Families | 44.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Grove vs Fort lupton
- The population in Fort lupton is higher at 8,829, compared to 7,215 in Grove.
- Residents in Grove have a higher median age of 46.9 years compared to 35.9 years in Fort lupton.
- Fort lupton has a higher median income of $71,293, compared to $56,469 in Grove.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Grove at 44.0% compared to 34.0% in Fort lupton.
- Grove has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 10% in Fort lupton.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Grove and Fort lupton at 3.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Grove vs Fort lupton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Grove | Fort lupton |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | Data is updating |
| White | 70 | 26 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 7 | 53 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 20 |
| American Indian | 11 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Grove vs Fort lupton
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Grove at 1% compared to 0% in Fort lupton.
- Grove has a higher percentage of White residents at 70% compared to 26% in Fort lupton.
- Both Grove and Fort lupton have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Fort lupton has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 53%, compared to 7% in Grove.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Fort lupton at 20%, compared to 11% in Grove.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Grove at 11% compared to 1% in Fort lupton.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Grove | Fort lupton |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.9% | 15.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.5% | 11.8% |
| Depression | 25.4% | 19.9% |
| Smoking | 19.6% | 15.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.1% | 17.0% |
| Obesity | 38.3% | 30.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 21.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Grove vs Fort lupton
- More residents in Grove report poor mental health at 18.9% compared to 15.8% in Fort lupton.
- Depression is more prevalent in Grove at 25.4% compared to 19.9% in Fort lupton.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Grove at 19.6% compared to 15.0% in Fort lupton.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Fort lupton at 17.0% compared to 15.1% in Grove.
- Obesity rates are higher in Grove at 38.3% compared to 30.2% in Fort lupton.
- Disability percentages are higher in Grove at 21.0% compared to 12.0% in Fort lupton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Grove | Fort lupton |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (20) | 1.6% (145) |
| High School Diploma | 14.8% (1,068) | 16.2% (1,428) |
| Less than High School | 11.5% (832) | 28.0% (2,476) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 20.3% (1,463) | 7.0% (622) |
Education Levels Comparison: Grove vs Fort lupton
- In Fort lupton, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.3% in Grove.
- In Fort lupton, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.2% compared to 14.8% in Grove.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fort lupton at 28.0%, compared to 11.5% in Grove.
- A higher percentage of residents in Grove hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.3% compared to 7.0% in Fort lupton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.