Demographics details for Groom, TX vs Massapequa park, NY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Groom, TX vs Massapequa park, NY.
| Data | Groom | Massapequa park |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 548 | 16,873 |
| Median Age | 46.0 years | 43.7 years |
| Median Income | $51,944 | $161,193 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 52.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Groom vs Massapequa park
- The population in Massapequa park is higher at 16,873, compared to 548 in Groom.
- Residents in Groom have a higher median age of 46.0 years compared to 43.7 years in Massapequa park.
- Massapequa park has a higher median income of $161,193, compared to $51,944 in Groom.
- In Massapequa park, the percentage of married families is higher at 52.0%, compared to 39.0% in Groom.
- Groom has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 0% in Massapequa park.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Groom and Massapequa park at 3.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Groom vs Massapequa park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Groom | Massapequa park |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 1 |
| White | 96 | 88 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Groom vs Massapequa park
- In Massapequa park, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Groom.
- Groom has a higher percentage of White residents at 96% compared to 88% in Massapequa park.
- In Massapequa park, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Groom.
- Massapequa park has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 3% in Groom.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Massapequa park at 4%, compared to 1% in Groom.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Groom and Massapequa park at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Groom | Massapequa park |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.3% | 13.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.6% | 8.0% |
| Depression | 25.1% | 17.9% |
| Smoking | 16.4% | 11.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.3% | 19.2% |
| Obesity | 34.7% | 26.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Groom vs Massapequa park
- More residents in Groom report poor mental health at 17.3% compared to 13.7% in Massapequa park.
- Depression is more prevalent in Groom at 25.1% compared to 17.9% in Massapequa park.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Groom at 16.4% compared to 11.5% in Massapequa park.
- Binge drinking is more common in Groom at 20.3% compared to 19.2% in Massapequa park.
- Obesity rates are higher in Groom at 34.7% compared to 26.4% in Massapequa park.
- Disability percentages are higher in Groom at 11.0% compared to 9.0% in Massapequa park.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Groom | Massapequa park |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (4) | 0.3% (45) |
| High School Diploma | 22.3% (122) | 15.3% (2,586) |
| Less than High School | 10.9% (60) | 3.8% (641) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.9% (60) | 36.6% (6,183) |
Education Levels Comparison: Groom vs Massapequa park
- A higher percentage of residents in Groom have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.3% in Massapequa park.
- A higher percentage of residents in Groom hold a high school diploma at 22.3% compared to 15.3% in Massapequa park.
- More residents in Groom have less than a high school education at 10.9% compared to 3.8% in Massapequa park.
- In Massapequa park, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 36.6% compared to 10.9% in Groom.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.