Demographics details for Greenwich, CT vs Laurel, MT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Greenwich, CT vs Laurel, MT.
| Data | Greenwich | Laurel |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 62,396 | 7,203 |
| Median Age | 42.3 years | 36.5 years |
| Median Income | $250,000 | $62,250 |
| Married Families | 62.2% | 37.0% |
| Poverty Level | 4% | 7% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.3 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Greenwich vs Laurel
- In Greenwich, the population is higher at 62,396, compared to 7,203 in Laurel.
- Residents in Greenwich have a higher median age of 42.3 years compared to 36.5 years in Laurel.
- Greenwich has a higher median income of $250,000 compared to $62,250 in Laurel.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Greenwich at 62.2% compared to 37.0% in Laurel.
- The poverty level is higher in Laurel at 7%, compared to 4% in Greenwich.
- Laurel has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 2.3% in Greenwich.
Demographics
Demographics Greenwich vs Laurel provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Greenwich | Laurel |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | Data is updating |
| White | 80 | 83 |
| Asian | 10 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 6 | 7 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 7 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Greenwich vs Laurel
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Greenwich at 2% compared to 0% in Laurel.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Laurel at 83% compared to 80% in Greenwich.
- The Asian population is larger in Greenwich at 10% compared to 2% in Laurel.
- Laurel has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 7%, compared to 6% in Greenwich.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Laurel at 7%, compared to 2% in Greenwich.
- In Laurel, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Greenwich.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Greenwich | Laurel |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 16.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 10.8% |
| Depression | Data is updating% | 27.8% |
| Smoking | Data is updating% | 15.8% |
| Binge Drinking | Data is updating% | 23.8% |
| Obesity | Data is updating% | 32.2% |
| Disability Percentage | Data is updating% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Greenwich vs Laurel
- In Laurel, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.4% compared to 0.0% in Greenwich.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Laurel at 27.8% versus 0.0% in Greenwich.
- Laurel has a higher smoking rate at 15.8% compared to 0.0% in Greenwich.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Laurel at 23.8% compared to 0.0% in Greenwich.
- Laurel has higher obesity rates at 32.2% compared to 0.0% in Greenwich.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Laurel at 13.0% compared to 0.0% in Greenwich.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Greenwich | Laurel |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.2% (14) |
| High School Diploma | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 21.7% (1,563) |
| Less than High School | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 7.7% (556) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 10.8% (780) |
Education Levels Comparison: Greenwich vs Laurel
- In Laurel, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.2% compared to 0.0% in Greenwich.
- In Laurel, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.7% compared to 0.0% in Greenwich.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Laurel at 7.7%, compared to 0.0% in Greenwich.
- In Laurel, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.8% compared to 0.0% in Greenwich.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.