Demographics details for Greenville, RI vs Corona, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Greenville, RI vs Corona, CA.
| Data | Greenville | Corona |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 8,777 | 159,567 |
| Median Age | 52.4 years | 35.9 years |
| Median Income | $92,367 | $103,727 |
| Married Families | 47.0% | 40.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.1 |
Population Comparison: Greenville vs Corona
- The population in Corona is higher at 159,567, compared to 8,777 in Greenville.
- Residents in Greenville have a higher median age of 52.4 years compared to 35.9 years in Corona.
- Corona has a higher median income of $103,727, compared to $92,367 in Greenville.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Greenville at 47.0% compared to 40.0% in Corona.
- The poverty level is higher in Corona at 11%, compared to 5% in Greenville.
- Corona has a higher unemployment rate at 4.1% compared to 3.5% in Greenville.
Demographics
Demographics Greenville vs Corona provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Greenville | Corona |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 6 |
| White | 90 | 21 |
| Asian | 1 | 11 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 48 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 13 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Greenville vs Corona
- In Corona, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 6% compared to 1% in Greenville.
- Greenville has a higher percentage of White residents at 90% compared to 21% in Corona.
- In Corona, the Asian population stands at 11%, greater than 1% in Greenville.
- Corona has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 48%, compared to 5% in Greenville.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Corona at 13%, compared to 3% in Greenville.
- In Corona, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Greenville.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Greenville | Corona |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.7% | 15.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.7% | 10.6% |
| Depression | 26.0% | 16.6% |
| Smoking | 12.0% | 11.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.0% | 16.7% |
| Obesity | 27.9% | 34.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Greenville vs Corona
- In Corona, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.1% compared to 14.7% in Greenville.
- Depression is more prevalent in Greenville at 26.0% compared to 16.6% in Corona.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Greenville at 12.0% compared to 11.8% in Corona.
- Binge drinking is more common in Greenville at 20.0% compared to 16.7% in Corona.
- Corona has higher obesity rates at 34.1% compared to 27.9% in Greenville.
- Disability percentages are higher in Greenville at 19.0% compared to 7.0% in Corona.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Greenville | Corona |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (24) | 1.9% (3,102) |
| High School Diploma | 18.7% (1,642) | 14.3% (22,788) |
| Less than High School | 10.8% (951) | 17.4% (27,748) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 30.2% (2,648) | 19.6% (31,335) |
Education Levels Comparison: Greenville vs Corona
- In Corona, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.9% compared to 0.3% in Greenville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Greenville hold a high school diploma at 18.7% compared to 14.3% in Corona.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Corona at 17.4%, compared to 10.8% in Greenville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Greenville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.2% compared to 19.6% in Corona.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.