Demographics details for Greenville, MS vs Lancaster, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Greenville, MS vs Lancaster, CA.
| Data | Greenville | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 28,017 | 169,185 |
| Median Age | 38.7 years | 33.6 years |
| Median Income | $35,148 | $71,367 |
| Married Families | 25.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 30% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.8 | 8.2 |
Population Comparison: Greenville vs Lancaster
- The population in Lancaster is higher at 169,185, compared to 28,017 in Greenville.
- Residents in Greenville have a higher median age of 38.7 years compared to 33.6 years in Lancaster.
- Lancaster has a higher median income of $71,367, compared to $35,148 in Greenville.
- In Lancaster, the percentage of married families is higher at 32.0%, compared to 25.0% in Greenville.
- Greenville has a higher poverty level at 30% compared to 15% in Lancaster.
- Lancaster has a higher unemployment rate at 8.2% compared to 5.8% in Greenville.
Demographics
Demographics Greenville vs Lancaster provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Greenville | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 87 | 21 |
| White | 11 | 10 |
| Asian | 1 | 4 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 46 |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 18 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Greenville vs Lancaster
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Greenville at 87% compared to 21% in Lancaster.
- Greenville has a higher percentage of White residents at 11% compared to 10% in Lancaster.
- In Lancaster, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 1% in Greenville.
- Lancaster has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 46%, compared to 0% in Greenville.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Lancaster at 18%, compared to 1% in Greenville.
- In Lancaster, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Greenville.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Greenville | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.4% | 17.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 16.3% | 13.5% |
| Depression | 21.2% | 17.7% |
| Smoking | 26.7% | 14.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 10.6% | 15.1% |
| Obesity | 46.0% | 32.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 28.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Greenville vs Lancaster
- More residents in Greenville report poor mental health at 19.4% compared to 17.8% in Lancaster.
- Depression is more prevalent in Greenville at 21.2% compared to 17.7% in Lancaster.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Greenville at 26.7% compared to 14.8% in Lancaster.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Lancaster at 15.1% compared to 10.6% in Greenville.
- Obesity rates are higher in Greenville at 46.0% compared to 32.9% in Lancaster.
- Disability percentages are higher in Greenville at 28.0% compared to 10.0% in Lancaster.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Greenville | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.8% (501) | 2.0% (3,403) |
| High School Diploma | 20.2% (5,661) | 17.5% (29,555) |
| Less than High School | 15.5% (4,352) | 21.5% (36,421) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.5% (4,052) | 12.3% (20,861) |
Education Levels Comparison: Greenville vs Lancaster
- In Lancaster, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.0% compared to 1.8% in Greenville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Greenville hold a high school diploma at 20.2% compared to 17.5% in Lancaster.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Lancaster at 21.5%, compared to 15.5% in Greenville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Greenville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.5% compared to 12.3% in Lancaster.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.