Demographics details for Greens fork, IN vs Salem, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Greens fork, IN vs Salem, OH.
| Data | Greens fork | Salem |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 326 | 11,729 |
| Median Age | 33.8 years | 41.3 years |
| Median Income | $69,844 | $45,380 |
| Married Families | 64.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Greens fork vs Salem
- The population in Salem is higher at 11,729, compared to 326 in Greens fork.
- The median age in Salem is higher at 41.3 years, compared to 33.8 years in Greens fork.
- Greens fork has a higher median income of $69,844 compared to $45,380 in Salem.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Greens fork at 64.0% compared to 31.0% in Salem.
- The poverty level is higher in Salem at 10%, compared to 9% in Greens fork.
- Salem has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 3.2% in Greens fork.
Demographics
Demographics Greens fork vs Salem provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Greens fork | Salem |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 1 |
| White | 90 | 97 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 1 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 2 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Greens fork vs Salem
- In Salem, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Greens fork.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Salem at 97% compared to 90% in Greens fork.
- Both Greens fork and Salem have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Greens fork at 1% compared to 0% in Salem.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Greens fork at 9% compared to 2% in Salem.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Greens fork and Salem at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Greens fork | Salem |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.9% | 19.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.6% | 13.0% |
| Depression | 29.3% | 24.7% |
| Smoking | 23.3% | 23.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.2% | 17.1% |
| Obesity | 36.8% | 45.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 31.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Greens fork vs Salem
- In Salem, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 18.9% in Greens fork.
- Depression is more prevalent in Greens fork at 29.3% compared to 24.7% in Salem.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Greens fork at 23.3% compared to 23.1% in Salem.
- Binge drinking is more common in Greens fork at 17.2% compared to 17.1% in Salem.
- Salem has higher obesity rates at 45.4% compared to 36.8% in Greens fork.
- Disability percentages are higher in Greens fork at 31.0% compared to 19.0% in Salem.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Greens fork | Salem |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.2% (142) |
| High School Diploma | 36.5% (119) | 27.3% (3,203) |
| Less than High School | 16.0% (52) | 18.0% (2,117) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.6% (51) | 13.8% (1,615) |
Education Levels Comparison: Greens fork vs Salem
- In Salem, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.0% in Greens fork.
- A higher percentage of residents in Greens fork hold a high school diploma at 36.5% compared to 27.3% in Salem.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Salem at 18.0%, compared to 16.0% in Greens fork.
- A higher percentage of residents in Greens fork hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.6% compared to 13.8% in Salem.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.