Demographics details for Green, OH vs Clarksville, AR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Green, OH vs Clarksville, AR.
| Data | Green | Clarksville |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 27,269 | 9,555 |
| Median Age | 41.1 years | 35.3 years |
| Median Income | $90,419 | $35,911 |
| Married Families | 45.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 4% | 18% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.7 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Green vs Clarksville
- In Green, the population is higher at 27,269, compared to 9,555 in Clarksville.
- Residents in Green have a higher median age of 41.1 years compared to 35.3 years in Clarksville.
- Green has a higher median income of $90,419 compared to $35,911 in Clarksville.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Green at 45.0% compared to 36.0% in Clarksville.
- The poverty level is higher in Clarksville at 18%, compared to 4% in Green.
- The unemployment rate in Green is higher at 4.7%, compared to 4.5% in Clarksville.
Demographics
Demographics Green vs Clarksville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Green | Clarksville |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 3 |
| White | 94 | 60 |
| Asian | 1 | 6 |
| Hispanic | 1 | 23 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 7 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Green vs Clarksville
- In Clarksville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 1% in Green.
- Green has a higher percentage of White residents at 94% compared to 60% in Clarksville.
- In Clarksville, the Asian population stands at 6%, greater than 1% in Green.
- Clarksville has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 23%, compared to 1% in Green.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Clarksville at 7%, compared to 3% in Green.
- In Clarksville, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Green.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Green | Clarksville |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.6% | 21.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.5% | 16.3% |
| Depression | 24.7% | 27.9% |
| Smoking | 17.4% | 24.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.1% | 13.9% |
| Obesity | 40.2% | 39.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Green vs Clarksville
- In Clarksville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.0% compared to 16.6% in Green.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Clarksville at 27.9% versus 24.7% in Green.
- Clarksville has a higher smoking rate at 24.5% compared to 17.4% in Green.
- Binge drinking is more common in Green at 19.1% compared to 13.9% in Clarksville.
- Obesity rates are higher in Green at 40.2% compared to 39.7% in Clarksville.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Clarksville at 20.0% compared to 9.0% in Green.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Green | Clarksville |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (46) | 4.2% (402) |
| High School Diploma | 16.6% (4,514) | 21.6% (2,064) |
| Less than High School | 3.0% (828) | 28.6% (2,735) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 29.3% (7,977) | 8.2% (786) |
Education Levels Comparison: Green vs Clarksville
- In Clarksville, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 4.2% compared to 0.2% in Green.
- In Clarksville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.6% compared to 16.6% in Green.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Clarksville at 28.6%, compared to 3.0% in Green.
- A higher percentage of residents in Green hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 29.3% compared to 8.2% in Clarksville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.