Demographics details for Green river, WY vs Milford, MA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Green river, WY vs Milford, MA.
Data | Green river | Milford |
---|---|---|
Population | 11,535 | 27,999 |
Median Age | 37.8 years | 43.5 years |
Median Income | $83,497 | $98,896 |
Married Families | 47.0% | 60.0% |
Poverty Level | 9% | 5% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.8 |
Population Comparison: Green river vs Milford
- The population in Milford is higher at 27,999, compared to 11,535 in Green river.
- The median age in Milford is higher at 43.5 years, compared to 37.8 years in Green river.
- Milford has a higher median income of $98,896, compared to $83,497 in Green river.
- In Milford, the percentage of married families is higher at 60.0%, compared to 47.0% in Green river.
- Green river has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 5% in Milford.
- The unemployment rate in Green river is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.8% in Milford.
Demographics
Demographics Green river vs Milford provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Green river | Milford |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 5 |
White | 74 | 87 |
Asian | 1 | 5 |
Hispanic | 15 | 3 |
Two or More Races | 9 | 1 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Green river vs Milford
- In Milford, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 0% in Green river.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Milford at 87% compared to 74% in Green river.
- In Milford, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 1% in Green river.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Green river at 15% compared to 3% in Milford.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Green river at 9% compared to 1% in Milford.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Green river at 1% compared to 0% in Milford.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Green river | Milford |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.2% | Data is updating% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.7% | Data is updating% |
Depression | 20.5% | Data is updating% |
Smoking | 18.1% | Data is updating% |
Binge Drinking | 17.8% | Data is updating% |
Obesity | 34.1% | Data is updating% |
Disability Percentage | 15.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Green river vs Milford
- More residents in Green river report poor mental health at 16.2% compared to 0.0% in Milford.
- Depression is more prevalent in Green river at 20.5% compared to 0.0% in Milford.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Green river at 18.1% compared to 0.0% in Milford.
- Binge drinking is more common in Green river at 17.8% compared to 0.0% in Milford.
- Obesity rates are higher in Green river at 34.1% compared to 0.0% in Milford.
- Disability percentages are higher in Green river at 15.0% compared to 0.0% in Milford.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Green river | Milford |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.8% (90) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 14.9% (1,713) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Less than High School | 6.6% (762) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.9% (1,718) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Green river vs Milford
- A higher percentage of residents in Green river have no formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.0% in Milford.
- A higher percentage of residents in Green river hold a high school diploma at 14.9% compared to 0.0% in Milford.
- More residents in Green river have less than a high school education at 6.6% compared to 0.0% in Milford.
- A higher percentage of residents in Green river hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.9% compared to 0.0% in Milford.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.