Demographics details for Green harbor, MA vs Tullahoma, TN

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Green harbor, MA vs Tullahoma, TN.

Data Green harbor Tullahoma
Population 2,703 20,830
Median Age 53.3 years 40.2 years
Median Income $111,250 $56,771
Married Families 55.0% 41.0%
Poverty Level 2% 10%
Unemployment Rate 2.5 3.5

Population Comparison: Green harbor vs Tullahoma

  • The population in Tullahoma is higher at 20,830, compared to 2,703 in Green harbor.
  • Residents in Green harbor have a higher median age of 53.3 years compared to 40.2 years in Tullahoma.
  • Green harbor has a higher median income of $111,250 compared to $56,771 in Tullahoma.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Green harbor at 55.0% compared to 41.0% in Tullahoma.
  • The poverty level is higher in Tullahoma at 10%, compared to 2% in Green harbor.
  • Tullahoma has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 2.5% in Green harbor.

Demographics

Demographics Green harbor vs Tullahoma provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Green harbor Tullahoma
Black Data is updating 6
White 100 83
Asian Data is updating 2
Hispanic Data is updating 5
Two or More Races Data is updating 4
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Green harbor vs Tullahoma

  • In Tullahoma, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 6% compared to 0% in Green harbor.
  • Green harbor has a higher percentage of White residents at 100% compared to 83% in Tullahoma.
  • In Tullahoma, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Green harbor.
  • Tullahoma has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 0% in Green harbor.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Tullahoma at 4%, compared to 0% in Green harbor.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Green harbor and Tullahoma at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Green harbor Tullahoma
Mental Health Not Good 15.3% 19.9%
Physical Health Not Good 8.4% 14.0%
Depression 22.7% 28.9%
Smoking 12.8% 22.6%
Binge Drinking 19.7% 15.1%
Obesity 27.3% 39.1%
Disability Percentage 13.0% 19.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Green harbor vs Tullahoma

  • In Tullahoma, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.9% compared to 15.3% in Green harbor.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Tullahoma at 28.9% versus 22.7% in Green harbor.
  • Tullahoma has a higher smoking rate at 22.6% compared to 12.8% in Green harbor.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Green harbor at 19.7% compared to 15.1% in Tullahoma.
  • Tullahoma has higher obesity rates at 39.1% compared to 27.3% in Green harbor.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Tullahoma at 19.0% compared to 13.0% in Green harbor.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Green harbor Tullahoma
No Schooling 1.5% (41) 0.6% (117)
High School Diploma 14.1% (382) 18.9% (3,932)
Less than High School 12.8% (346) 14.1% (2,944)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 30.9% (834) 19.3% (4,012)

Education Levels Comparison: Green harbor vs Tullahoma

  • A higher percentage of residents in Green harbor have no formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.6% in Tullahoma.
  • In Tullahoma, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.9% compared to 14.1% in Green harbor.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Tullahoma at 14.1%, compared to 12.8% in Green harbor.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Green harbor hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.9% compared to 19.3% in Tullahoma.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.