Demographics details for Greeley, CO vs Fontana, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Greeley, CO vs Fontana, CA.
| Data | Greeley | Fontana |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 109,209 | 212,475 |
| Median Age | 31.9 years | 32.6 years |
| Median Income | $65,525 | $93,230 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.8 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Greeley vs Fontana
- The population in Fontana is higher at 212,475, compared to 109,209 in Greeley.
- The median age in Fontana is higher at 32.6 years, compared to 31.9 years in Greeley.
- Fontana has a higher median income of $93,230, compared to $65,525 in Greeley.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Greeley and Fontana at 36.0%.
- The poverty level is higher in Fontana at 13%, compared to 12% in Greeley.
- Fontana has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 4.8% in Greeley.
Demographics
Demographics Greeley vs Fontana provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Greeley | Fontana |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 8 |
| White | 45 | 2 |
| Asian | 1 | 7 |
| Hispanic | 39 | 68 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 14 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Greeley vs Fontana
- In Fontana, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 8% compared to 3% in Greeley.
- Greeley has a higher percentage of White residents at 45% compared to 2% in Fontana.
- In Fontana, the Asian population stands at 7%, greater than 1% in Greeley.
- Fontana has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 68%, compared to 39% in Greeley.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Fontana at 14%, compared to 11% in Greeley.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Greeley and Fontana at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Greeley | Fontana |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.0% | 16.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.3% | 12.6% |
| Depression | 21.4% | 17.0% |
| Smoking | 16.5% | 12.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.7% | 15.1% |
| Obesity | 30.8% | 38.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Greeley vs Fontana
- More residents in Greeley report poor mental health at 17.0% compared to 16.2% in Fontana.
- Depression is more prevalent in Greeley at 21.4% compared to 17.0% in Fontana.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Greeley at 16.5% compared to 12.4% in Fontana.
- Binge drinking is more common in Greeley at 16.7% compared to 15.1% in Fontana.
- Fontana has higher obesity rates at 38.6% compared to 30.8% in Greeley.
- Disability percentages are higher in Greeley at 11.0% compared to 8.0% in Fontana.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Greeley | Fontana |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.2% (2,416) | 2.2% (4,748) |
| High School Diploma | 12.0% (13,106) | 16.3% (34,556) |
| Less than High School | 19.3% (21,128) | 25.3% (53,655) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.4% (17,877) | 12.0% (25,587) |
Education Levels Comparison: Greeley vs Fontana
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Greeley and Fontana at 2.2%.
- In Fontana, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.3% compared to 12.0% in Greeley.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fontana at 25.3%, compared to 19.3% in Greeley.
- A higher percentage of residents in Greeley hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.4% compared to 12.0% in Fontana.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.