Demographics details for Grand junction, CO vs Erwin, TN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Grand junction, CO vs Erwin, TN.
Data | Grand junction | Erwin |
---|---|---|
Population | 68,034 | 5,953 |
Median Age | 39.9 years | 46.8 years |
Median Income | $62,993 | $40,670 |
Married Families | 35.0% | 48.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.7 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Grand junction vs Erwin
- In Grand junction, the population is higher at 68,034, compared to 5,953 in Erwin.
- The median age in Erwin is higher at 46.8 years, compared to 39.9 years in Grand junction.
- Grand junction has a higher median income of $62,993 compared to $40,670 in Erwin.
- In Erwin, the percentage of married families is higher at 48.0%, compared to 35.0% in Grand junction.
- The poverty level is higher in Erwin at 12%, compared to 10% in Grand junction.
- The unemployment rate in Grand junction is higher at 4.7%, compared to 4.5% in Erwin.
Demographics
Demographics Grand junction vs Erwin provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Grand junction | Erwin |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | Data is updating |
White | 73 | 87 |
Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 16 | 8 |
Two or More Races | 8 | 5 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Grand junction vs Erwin
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Grand junction at 1% compared to 0% in Erwin.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Erwin at 87% compared to 73% in Grand junction.
- The Asian population is larger in Grand junction at 1% compared to 0% in Erwin.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Grand junction at 16% compared to 8% in Erwin.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Grand junction at 8% compared to 5% in Erwin.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Grand junction at 1% compared to 0% in Erwin.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Grand junction | Erwin |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.8% | 20.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.8% | 14.1% |
Depression | 24.5% | 29.7% |
Smoking | 17.3% | 23.6% |
Binge Drinking | 19.2% | 15.9% |
Obesity | 29.2% | 38.0% |
Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 21.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Grand junction vs Erwin
- In Erwin, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.2% compared to 17.8% in Grand junction.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Erwin at 29.7% versus 24.5% in Grand junction.
- Erwin has a higher smoking rate at 23.6% compared to 17.3% in Grand junction.
- Binge drinking is more common in Grand junction at 19.2% compared to 15.9% in Erwin.
- Erwin has higher obesity rates at 38.0% compared to 29.2% in Grand junction.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Erwin at 21.0% compared to 15.0% in Grand junction.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Grand junction | Erwin |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.4% (245) | 0.3% (15) |
High School Diploma | 13.9% (9,476) | 20.2% (1,201) |
Less than High School | 9.7% (6,605) | 19.7% (1,170) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 23.8% (16,201) | 11.7% (698) |
Education Levels Comparison: Grand junction vs Erwin
- A higher percentage of residents in Grand junction have no formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.3% in Erwin.
- In Erwin, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.2% compared to 13.9% in Grand junction.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Erwin at 19.7%, compared to 9.7% in Grand junction.
- A higher percentage of residents in Grand junction hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.8% compared to 11.7% in Erwin.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.