Demographics details for Grand junction, CO vs Carthage, MO

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Grand junction, CO vs Carthage, MO.

Data Grand junction Carthage
Population 68,034 15,491
Median Age 39.9 years 31.6 years
Median Income $62,993 $43,526
Married Families 35.0% 29.0%
Poverty Level 10% 14%
Unemployment Rate 4.7 4.5

Population Comparison: Grand junction vs Carthage

  • In Grand junction, the population is higher at 68,034, compared to 15,491 in Carthage.
  • Residents in Grand junction have a higher median age of 39.9 years compared to 31.6 years in Carthage.
  • Grand junction has a higher median income of $62,993 compared to $43,526 in Carthage.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Grand junction at 35.0% compared to 29.0% in Carthage.
  • The poverty level is higher in Carthage at 14%, compared to 10% in Grand junction.
  • The unemployment rate in Grand junction is higher at 4.7%, compared to 4.5% in Carthage.

Demographics

Demographics Grand junction vs Carthage provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Grand junction Carthage
Black 1 2
White 73 52
Asian 1 1
Hispanic 16 33
Two or More Races 8 10
American Indian 1 2

Demographics Comparison: Grand junction vs Carthage

  • In Carthage, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 1% in Grand junction.
  • Grand junction has a higher percentage of White residents at 73% compared to 52% in Carthage.
  • Both Grand junction and Carthage have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
  • Carthage has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 33%, compared to 16% in Grand junction.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Carthage at 10%, compared to 8% in Grand junction.
  • In Carthage, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 1% in Grand junction.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Grand junction Carthage
Mental Health Not Good 17.8% 20.2%
Physical Health Not Good 11.8% 16.0%
Depression 24.5% 26.7%
Smoking 17.3% 24.9%
Binge Drinking 19.2% 15.0%
Obesity 29.2% 42.7%
Disability Percentage 15.0% 13.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Grand junction vs Carthage

  • In Carthage, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.2% compared to 17.8% in Grand junction.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Carthage at 26.7% versus 24.5% in Grand junction.
  • Carthage has a higher smoking rate at 24.9% compared to 17.3% in Grand junction.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Grand junction at 19.2% compared to 15.0% in Carthage.
  • Carthage has higher obesity rates at 42.7% compared to 29.2% in Grand junction.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Grand junction at 15.0% compared to 13.0% in Carthage.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Grand junction Carthage
No Schooling 0.4% (245) 3.7% (576)
High School Diploma 13.9% (9,476) 13.1% (2,032)
Less than High School 9.7% (6,605) 30.4% (4,717)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 23.8% (16,201) 12.9% (2,006)

Education Levels Comparison: Grand junction vs Carthage

  • In Carthage, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.7% compared to 0.4% in Grand junction.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Grand junction hold a high school diploma at 13.9% compared to 13.1% in Carthage.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Carthage at 30.4%, compared to 9.7% in Grand junction.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Grand junction hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.8% compared to 12.9% in Carthage.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.