Demographics details for Grahamsville, NY vs Coalinga, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Grahamsville, NY vs Coalinga, CA.
| Data | Grahamsville | Coalinga |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 427 | 17,024 |
| Median Age | 42.5 years | 35.0 years |
| Median Income | $76,750 | $68,976 |
| Married Families | 41.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 6.5 |
Population Comparison: Grahamsville vs Coalinga
- The population in Coalinga is higher at 17,024, compared to 427 in Grahamsville.
- Residents in Grahamsville have a higher median age of 42.5 years compared to 35.0 years in Coalinga.
- Grahamsville has a higher median income of $76,750 compared to $68,976 in Coalinga.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Grahamsville at 41.0% compared to 31.0% in Coalinga.
- The poverty level is higher in Coalinga at 15%, compared to 0% in Grahamsville.
- Coalinga has a higher unemployment rate at 6.5% compared to 3.5% in Grahamsville.
Demographics
Demographics Grahamsville vs Coalinga provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Grahamsville | Coalinga |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 10 | 4 |
| White | 56 | 9 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | 23 | 65 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 18 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Grahamsville vs Coalinga
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Grahamsville at 10% compared to 4% in Coalinga.
- Grahamsville has a higher percentage of White residents at 56% compared to 9% in Coalinga.
- In Coalinga, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Grahamsville.
- Coalinga has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 65%, compared to 23% in Grahamsville.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Coalinga at 18%, compared to 11% in Grahamsville.
- In Coalinga, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Grahamsville.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Grahamsville | Coalinga |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 16.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 13.9% |
| Depression | Data is updating% | 16.4% |
| Smoking | Data is updating% | 17.2% |
| Binge Drinking | Data is updating% | 15.9% |
| Obesity | Data is updating% | 39.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Grahamsville vs Coalinga
- In Coalinga, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.9% compared to 0.0% in Grahamsville.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Coalinga at 16.4% versus 0.0% in Grahamsville.
- Coalinga has a higher smoking rate at 17.2% compared to 0.0% in Grahamsville.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Coalinga at 15.9% compared to 0.0% in Grahamsville.
- Coalinga has higher obesity rates at 39.1% compared to 0.0% in Grahamsville.
- Disability percentages are higher in Grahamsville at 14.0% compared to 13.0% in Coalinga.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Grahamsville | Coalinga |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 3.2% (537) |
| High School Diploma | 6.1% (26) | 13.8% (2,349) |
| Less than High School | 11.7% (50) | 39.2% (6,672) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.1% (43) | 8.1% (1,380) |
Education Levels Comparison: Grahamsville vs Coalinga
- In Coalinga, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.2% compared to 0.0% in Grahamsville.
- In Coalinga, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.8% compared to 6.1% in Grahamsville.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Coalinga at 39.2%, compared to 11.7% in Grahamsville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Grahamsville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.1% compared to 8.1% in Coalinga.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.