Demographics details for Goodman, MO vs Lawrence, KS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Goodman, MO vs Lawrence, KS.
| Data | Goodman | Lawrence |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,256 | 95,794 |
| Median Age | 28.6 years | 28.8 years |
| Median Income | $40,913 | $59,834 |
| Married Families | 33.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.0 | 3.9 |
Population Comparison: Goodman vs Lawrence
- The population in Lawrence is higher at 95,794, compared to 1,256 in Goodman.
- The median age in Lawrence is higher at 28.8 years, compared to 28.6 years in Goodman.
- Lawrence has a higher median income of $59,834, compared to $40,913 in Goodman.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Goodman at 33.0% compared to 32.0% in Lawrence.
- The poverty level is identical in both Goodman and Lawrence at 12%.
- Lawrence has a higher unemployment rate at 3.9% compared to 3.0% in Goodman.
Demographics
Demographics Goodman vs Lawrence provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Goodman | Lawrence |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 5 |
| White | 83 | 71 |
| Asian | 5 | 6 |
| Hispanic | 7 | 7 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 9 |
| American Indian | 2 | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Goodman vs Lawrence
- In Lawrence, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 1% in Goodman.
- Goodman has a higher percentage of White residents at 83% compared to 71% in Lawrence.
- In Lawrence, the Asian population stands at 6%, greater than 5% in Goodman.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Goodman and Lawrence at 7%.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Lawrence at 9%, compared to 2% in Goodman.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Goodman and Lawrence at 2%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Goodman | Lawrence |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.7% | 16.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.2% | 9.5% |
| Depression | 25.7% | 22.3% |
| Smoking | 26.9% | 14.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.4% | 19.6% |
| Obesity | 43.7% | 32.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Goodman vs Lawrence
- More residents in Goodman report poor mental health at 19.7% compared to 16.5% in Lawrence.
- Depression is more prevalent in Goodman at 25.7% compared to 22.3% in Lawrence.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Goodman at 26.9% compared to 14.8% in Lawrence.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Lawrence at 19.6% compared to 17.4% in Goodman.
- Obesity rates are higher in Goodman at 43.7% compared to 32.8% in Lawrence.
- Disability percentages are higher in Goodman at 15.0% compared to 10.0% in Lawrence.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Goodman | Lawrence |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.2% (28) | 0.5% (466) |
| High School Diploma | 15.8% (198) | 8.2% (7,882) |
| Less than High School | 21.5% (270) | 4.0% (3,784) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.6% (121) | 31.1% (29,776) |
Education Levels Comparison: Goodman vs Lawrence
- A higher percentage of residents in Goodman have no formal schooling at 2.2% compared to 0.5% in Lawrence.
- A higher percentage of residents in Goodman hold a high school diploma at 15.8% compared to 8.2% in Lawrence.
- More residents in Goodman have less than a high school education at 21.5% compared to 4.0% in Lawrence.
- In Lawrence, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 31.1% compared to 9.6% in Goodman.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.