Demographics details for Gloster, MS vs Rialto, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Gloster, MS vs Rialto, CA.
| Data | Gloster | Rialto |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 877 | 103,545 |
| Median Age | 42.5 years | 31.2 years |
| Median Income | $22,131 | $80,750 |
| Married Families | 44.0% | 33.0% |
| Poverty Level | 24% | 18% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.1 | 5.7 |
Population Comparison: Gloster vs Rialto
- The population in Rialto is higher at 103,545, compared to 877 in Gloster.
- Residents in Gloster have a higher median age of 42.5 years compared to 31.2 years in Rialto.
- Rialto has a higher median income of $80,750, compared to $22,131 in Gloster.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Gloster at 44.0% compared to 33.0% in Rialto.
- Gloster has a higher poverty level at 24% compared to 18% in Rialto.
- Rialto has a higher unemployment rate at 5.7% compared to 5.1% in Gloster.
Demographics
Demographics Gloster vs Rialto provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Gloster | Rialto |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 114 | 12 |
| White | -16 | -7 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | 1 | 75 |
| Two or More Races | Data is updating | 17 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Gloster vs Rialto
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Gloster at 114% compared to 12% in Rialto.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Rialto at -7% compared to -16% in Gloster.
- In Rialto, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Gloster.
- Rialto has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 75%, compared to 1% in Gloster.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Rialto at 17%, compared to 0% in Gloster.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Gloster and Rialto at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Gloster | Rialto |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.4% | 17.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 16.1% | 13.7% |
| Depression | 21.4% | 17.5% |
| Smoking | 26.4% | 13.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 11.7% | 14.8% |
| Obesity | 46.0% | 41.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 27.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Gloster vs Rialto
- More residents in Gloster report poor mental health at 19.4% compared to 17.1% in Rialto.
- Depression is more prevalent in Gloster at 21.4% compared to 17.5% in Rialto.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Gloster at 26.4% compared to 13.8% in Rialto.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Rialto at 14.8% compared to 11.7% in Gloster.
- Obesity rates are higher in Gloster at 46.0% compared to 41.1% in Rialto.
- Disability percentages are higher in Gloster at 27.0% compared to 9.0% in Rialto.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Gloster | Rialto |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 2.7% (2,754) |
| High School Diploma | 48.7% (427) | 18.6% (19,301) |
| Less than High School | 21.7% (190) | 30.0% (31,028) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.0% (88) | 7.5% (7,751) |
Education Levels Comparison: Gloster vs Rialto
- In Rialto, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 0.0% in Gloster.
- A higher percentage of residents in Gloster hold a high school diploma at 48.7% compared to 18.6% in Rialto.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Rialto at 30.0%, compared to 21.7% in Gloster.
- A higher percentage of residents in Gloster hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.0% compared to 7.5% in Rialto.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.