Demographics details for Glendale, AZ vs Caruthersville, MO

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Glendale, AZ vs Caruthersville, MO.

Data Glendale Caruthersville
Population 252,136 5,295
Median Age 34.1 years 36.8 years
Median Income $66,375 $35,585
Married Families 33.0% 26.0%
Poverty Level 11% 20%
Unemployment Rate 3.6 5.6

Population Comparison: Glendale vs Caruthersville

  • In Glendale, the population is higher at 252,136, compared to 5,295 in Caruthersville.
  • The median age in Caruthersville is higher at 36.8 years, compared to 34.1 years in Glendale.
  • Glendale has a higher median income of $66,375 compared to $35,585 in Caruthersville.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Glendale at 33.0% compared to 26.0% in Caruthersville.
  • The poverty level is higher in Caruthersville at 20%, compared to 11% in Glendale.
  • Caruthersville has a higher unemployment rate at 5.6% compared to 3.6% in Glendale.

Demographics

Demographics Glendale vs Caruthersville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Glendale Caruthersville
Black 7 40
White 28 52
Asian 4 Data is updating
Hispanic 40 5
Two or More Races 19 3
American Indian 2 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Glendale vs Caruthersville

  • In Caruthersville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 40% compared to 7% in Glendale.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Caruthersville at 52% compared to 28% in Glendale.
  • The Asian population is larger in Glendale at 4% compared to 0% in Caruthersville.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Glendale at 40% compared to 5% in Caruthersville.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Glendale at 19% compared to 3% in Caruthersville.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Glendale at 2% compared to 0% in Caruthersville.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Glendale Caruthersville
Mental Health Not Good 18.4% 21.3%
Physical Health Not Good 12.4% 17.0%
Depression 20.2% 25.6%
Smoking 17.2% 28.4%
Binge Drinking 16.8% 14.6%
Obesity 32.9% 44.0%
Disability Percentage 13.0% 27.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Glendale vs Caruthersville

  • In Caruthersville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.3% compared to 18.4% in Glendale.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Caruthersville at 25.6% versus 20.2% in Glendale.
  • Caruthersville has a higher smoking rate at 28.4% compared to 17.2% in Glendale.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Glendale at 16.8% compared to 14.6% in Caruthersville.
  • Caruthersville has higher obesity rates at 44.0% compared to 32.9% in Glendale.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Caruthersville at 27.0% compared to 13.0% in Glendale.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Glendale Caruthersville
No Schooling 1.7% (4,190) 0.8% (42)
High School Diploma 14.7% (37,119) 23.6% (1,249)
Less than High School 18.6% (46,911) 23.0% (1,217)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 14.2% (35,878) 9.1% (484)

Education Levels Comparison: Glendale vs Caruthersville

  • A higher percentage of residents in Glendale have no formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.8% in Caruthersville.
  • In Caruthersville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.6% compared to 14.7% in Glendale.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Caruthersville at 23.0%, compared to 18.6% in Glendale.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Glendale hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.2% compared to 9.1% in Caruthersville.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.