Demographics details for Glen ellyn, IL vs Spanish fork, UT

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Glen ellyn, IL vs Spanish fork, UT.

Data Glen ellyn Spanish fork
Population 28,364 44,102
Median Age 41.6 years 27.4 years
Median Income $128,132 $93,989
Married Families 48.0% 43.0%
Poverty Level 5% 6%
Unemployment Rate 5.6 3.8

Population Comparison: Glen ellyn vs Spanish fork

  • The population in Spanish fork is higher at 44,102, compared to 28,364 in Glen ellyn.
  • Residents in Glen ellyn have a higher median age of 41.6 years compared to 27.4 years in Spanish fork.
  • Glen ellyn has a higher median income of $128,132 compared to $93,989 in Spanish fork.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Glen ellyn at 48.0% compared to 43.0% in Spanish fork.
  • The poverty level is higher in Spanish fork at 6%, compared to 5% in Glen ellyn.
  • The unemployment rate in Glen ellyn is higher at 5.6%, compared to 3.8% in Spanish fork.

Demographics

Demographics Glen ellyn vs Spanish fork provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Glen ellyn Spanish fork
Black 3 1
White 78 80
Asian 9 Data is updating
Hispanic 5 12
Two or More Races 5 7
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Glen ellyn vs Spanish fork

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Glen ellyn at 3% compared to 1% in Spanish fork.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Spanish fork at 80% compared to 78% in Glen ellyn.
  • The Asian population is larger in Glen ellyn at 9% compared to 0% in Spanish fork.
  • Spanish fork has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 12%, compared to 5% in Glen ellyn.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Spanish fork at 7%, compared to 5% in Glen ellyn.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Glen ellyn and Spanish fork at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Glen ellyn Spanish fork
Mental Health Not Good 11.9% 15.0%
Physical Health Not Good 7.4% 10.8%
Depression 17.3% 23.8%
Smoking 9.4% 7.7%
Binge Drinking 17.2% 8.3%
Obesity 29.2% 31.0%
Disability Percentage 9.0% 8.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Glen ellyn vs Spanish fork

  • In Spanish fork, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.0% compared to 11.9% in Glen ellyn.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Spanish fork at 23.8% versus 17.3% in Glen ellyn.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Glen ellyn at 9.4% compared to 7.7% in Spanish fork.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Glen ellyn at 17.2% compared to 8.3% in Spanish fork.
  • Spanish fork has higher obesity rates at 31.0% compared to 29.2% in Glen ellyn.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Glen ellyn at 9.0% compared to 8.0% in Spanish fork.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Glen ellyn Spanish fork
No Schooling 0.3% (93) 0.4% (175)
High School Diploma 6.4% (1,815) 9.1% (4,010)
Less than High School 4.1% (1,149) 5.9% (2,583)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 45.8% (12,997) 19.4% (8,546)

Education Levels Comparison: Glen ellyn vs Spanish fork

  • In Spanish fork, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.3% in Glen ellyn.
  • In Spanish fork, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 9.1% compared to 6.4% in Glen ellyn.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Spanish fork at 5.9%, compared to 4.1% in Glen ellyn.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Glen ellyn hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 45.8% compared to 19.4% in Spanish fork.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.