Demographics details for Gleason, WI vs Petaluma, CA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Gleason, WI vs Petaluma, CA.

Data Gleason Petaluma
Population 243 58,652
Median Age 40.0 years 43.5 years
Median Income $65,000 $108,527
Married Families 70.0% 44.0%
Poverty Level 10% 7%
Unemployment Rate 4.0 3.6

Population Comparison: Gleason vs Petaluma

  • The population in Petaluma is higher at 58,652, compared to 243 in Gleason.
  • The median age in Petaluma is higher at 43.5 years, compared to 40.0 years in Gleason.
  • Petaluma has a higher median income of $108,527, compared to $65,000 in Gleason.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Gleason at 70.0% compared to 44.0% in Petaluma.
  • Gleason has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 7% in Petaluma.
  • The unemployment rate in Gleason is higher at 4.0%, compared to 3.6% in Petaluma.

Demographics

Demographics Gleason vs Petaluma provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Gleason Petaluma
Black Data is updating 1
White 100 62
Asian Data is updating 5
Hispanic Data is updating 20
Two or More Races Data is updating 11
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Gleason vs Petaluma

  • In Petaluma, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Gleason.
  • Gleason has a higher percentage of White residents at 100% compared to 62% in Petaluma.
  • In Petaluma, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 0% in Gleason.
  • Petaluma has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 20%, compared to 0% in Gleason.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Petaluma at 11%, compared to 0% in Gleason.
  • In Petaluma, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Gleason.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Gleason Petaluma
Mental Health Not Good Data is updating% 15.1%
Physical Health Not Good Data is updating% 9.5%
Depression Data is updating% 20.1%
Smoking Data is updating% 10.5%
Binge Drinking Data is updating% 20.4%
Obesity Data is updating% 27.5%
Disability Percentage Data is updating% 10.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Gleason vs Petaluma

  • In Petaluma, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.1% compared to 0.0% in Gleason.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Petaluma at 20.1% versus 0.0% in Gleason.
  • Petaluma has a higher smoking rate at 10.5% compared to 0.0% in Gleason.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Petaluma at 20.4% compared to 0.0% in Gleason.
  • Petaluma has higher obesity rates at 27.5% compared to 0.0% in Gleason.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Petaluma at 10.0% compared to 0.0% in Gleason.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Gleason Petaluma
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 1.0% (558)
High School Diploma 0.0% (Data is updating) 11.0% (6,434)
Less than High School 0.0% (Data is updating) 11.1% (6,496)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 0.0% (Data is updating) 32.4% (18,996)

Education Levels Comparison: Gleason vs Petaluma

  • In Petaluma, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.0% in Gleason.
  • In Petaluma, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 11.0% compared to 0.0% in Gleason.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Petaluma at 11.1%, compared to 0.0% in Gleason.
  • In Petaluma, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 32.4% compared to 0.0% in Gleason.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.