Demographics details for Glasgow, MO vs Hyattsville, MD

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Glasgow, MO vs Hyattsville, MD.

Data Glasgow Hyattsville
Population 1,089 20,675
Median Age 44.4 years 35.5 years
Median Income $47,788 $90,329
Married Families 39.0% 33.0%
Poverty Level 12% 11%
Unemployment Rate 3.2 4.2

Population Comparison: Glasgow vs Hyattsville

  • The population in Hyattsville is higher at 20,675, compared to 1,089 in Glasgow.
  • Residents in Glasgow have a higher median age of 44.4 years compared to 35.5 years in Hyattsville.
  • Hyattsville has a higher median income of $90,329, compared to $47,788 in Glasgow.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Glasgow at 39.0% compared to 33.0% in Hyattsville.
  • Glasgow has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 11% in Hyattsville.
  • Hyattsville has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.2% in Glasgow.

Demographics

Demographics Glasgow vs Hyattsville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Glasgow Hyattsville
Black 12 28
White 82 21
Asian Data is updating 7
Hispanic 4 36
Two or More Races 2 7
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Glasgow vs Hyattsville

  • In Hyattsville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 28% compared to 12% in Glasgow.
  • Glasgow has a higher percentage of White residents at 82% compared to 21% in Hyattsville.
  • In Hyattsville, the Asian population stands at 7%, greater than 0% in Glasgow.
  • Hyattsville has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 36%, compared to 4% in Glasgow.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Hyattsville at 7%, compared to 2% in Glasgow.
  • In Hyattsville, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Glasgow.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Glasgow Hyattsville
Mental Health Not Good 17.8% 13.8%
Physical Health Not Good 12.7% 9.7%
Depression 24.6% 13.8%
Smoking 21.1% 11.7%
Binge Drinking 18.3% 12.8%
Obesity 39.8% 38.0%
Disability Percentage 24.0% 7.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Glasgow vs Hyattsville

  • More residents in Glasgow report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 13.8% in Hyattsville.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Glasgow at 24.6% compared to 13.8% in Hyattsville.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Glasgow at 21.1% compared to 11.7% in Hyattsville.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Glasgow at 18.3% compared to 12.8% in Hyattsville.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Glasgow at 39.8% compared to 38.0% in Hyattsville.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Glasgow at 24.0% compared to 7.0% in Hyattsville.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Glasgow Hyattsville
No Schooling 0.6% (7) 3.3% (682)
High School Diploma 27.5% (299) 10.3% (2,131)
Less than High School 10.8% (118) 26.0% (5,380)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 15.5% (169) 33.1% (6,840)

Education Levels Comparison: Glasgow vs Hyattsville

  • In Hyattsville, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.3% compared to 0.6% in Glasgow.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Glasgow hold a high school diploma at 27.5% compared to 10.3% in Hyattsville.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Hyattsville at 26.0%, compared to 10.8% in Glasgow.
  • In Hyattsville, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 33.1% compared to 15.5% in Glasgow.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.