Demographics details for Gilbert, AZ vs Central city, KY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Gilbert, AZ vs Central city, KY.
| Data | Gilbert | Central city |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 275,346 | 5,810 |
| Median Age | 35.4 years | 33.5 years |
| Median Income | $115,179 | $52,184 |
| Married Families | 42.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 6% | 16% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.0 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Gilbert vs Central city
- In Gilbert, the population is higher at 275,346, compared to 5,810 in Central city.
- Residents in Gilbert have a higher median age of 35.4 years compared to 33.5 years in Central city.
- Gilbert has a higher median income of $115,179 compared to $52,184 in Central city.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Gilbert at 42.0% compared to 38.0% in Central city.
- The poverty level is higher in Central city at 16%, compared to 6% in Gilbert.
- Central city has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.0% in Gilbert.
Demographics
Demographics Gilbert vs Central city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Gilbert | Central city |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | 3 |
| White | 62 | 88 |
| Asian | 6 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 17 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 10 | 6 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Gilbert vs Central city
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Gilbert at 4% compared to 3% in Central city.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Central city at 88% compared to 62% in Gilbert.
- The Asian population is larger in Gilbert at 6% compared to 0% in Central city.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Gilbert at 17% compared to 2% in Central city.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Gilbert at 10% compared to 6% in Central city.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Gilbert and Central city at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Gilbert | Central city |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.2% | 19.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.4% | 15.5% |
| Depression | 19.0% | 26.8% |
| Smoking | 11.3% | 24.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.1% | 14.8% |
| Obesity | 27.2% | 41.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Gilbert vs Central city
- In Central city, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 15.2% in Gilbert.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Central city at 26.8% versus 19.0% in Gilbert.
- Central city has a higher smoking rate at 24.8% compared to 11.3% in Gilbert.
- Binge drinking is more common in Gilbert at 19.1% compared to 14.8% in Central city.
- Central city has higher obesity rates at 41.9% compared to 27.2% in Gilbert.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Central city at 15.0% compared to 7.0% in Gilbert.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Gilbert | Central city |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (1,279) | 1.1% (65) |
| High School Diploma | 8.1% (22,388) | 15.4% (897) |
| Less than High School | 4.0% (10,945) | 15.6% (905) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 28.4% (78,297) | 8.3% (480) |
Education Levels Comparison: Gilbert vs Central city
- In Central city, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.5% in Gilbert.
- In Central city, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.4% compared to 8.1% in Gilbert.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Central city at 15.6%, compared to 4.0% in Gilbert.
- A higher percentage of residents in Gilbert hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 28.4% compared to 8.3% in Central city.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.