Demographics details for Gibsonville, NC vs Mount clemens, MI

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Gibsonville, NC vs Mount clemens, MI.

Data Gibsonville Mount clemens
Population 9,075 15,409
Median Age 40.3 years 40.2 years
Median Income $98,558 $55,154
Married Families 43.0% 30.0%
Poverty Level 9% 12%
Unemployment Rate 3.4 3.5

Population Comparison: Gibsonville vs Mount clemens

  • The population in Mount clemens is higher at 15,409, compared to 9,075 in Gibsonville.
  • Residents in Gibsonville have a higher median age of 40.3 years compared to 40.2 years in Mount clemens.
  • Gibsonville has a higher median income of $98,558 compared to $55,154 in Mount clemens.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Gibsonville at 43.0% compared to 30.0% in Mount clemens.
  • The poverty level is higher in Mount clemens at 12%, compared to 9% in Gibsonville.
  • Mount clemens has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.4% in Gibsonville.

Demographics

Demographics Gibsonville vs Mount clemens provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Gibsonville Mount clemens
Black 29 24
White 69 65
Asian 1 Data is updating
Hispanic Data is updating 3
Two or More Races 1 8
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Gibsonville vs Mount clemens

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Gibsonville at 29% compared to 24% in Mount clemens.
  • Gibsonville has a higher percentage of White residents at 69% compared to 65% in Mount clemens.
  • The Asian population is larger in Gibsonville at 1% compared to 0% in Mount clemens.
  • Mount clemens has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 3%, compared to 0% in Gibsonville.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Mount clemens at 8%, compared to 1% in Gibsonville.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Gibsonville and Mount clemens at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Gibsonville Mount clemens
Mental Health Not Good 15.4% 19.9%
Physical Health Not Good 9.8% 14.1%
Depression 24.2% 25.8%
Smoking 14.0% 25.2%
Binge Drinking 18.2% 16.9%
Obesity 32.7% 42.7%
Disability Percentage 8.0% 14.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Gibsonville vs Mount clemens

  • In Mount clemens, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.9% compared to 15.4% in Gibsonville.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Mount clemens at 25.8% versus 24.2% in Gibsonville.
  • Mount clemens has a higher smoking rate at 25.2% compared to 14.0% in Gibsonville.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Gibsonville at 18.2% compared to 16.9% in Mount clemens.
  • Mount clemens has higher obesity rates at 42.7% compared to 32.7% in Gibsonville.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Mount clemens at 14.0% compared to 8.0% in Gibsonville.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Gibsonville Mount clemens
No Schooling 0.1% (7) 1.4% (222)
High School Diploma 10.9% (985) 22.3% (3,437)
Less than High School 7.4% (672) 16.6% (2,554)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 24.9% (2,261) 12.1% (1,867)

Education Levels Comparison: Gibsonville vs Mount clemens

  • In Mount clemens, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.1% in Gibsonville.
  • In Mount clemens, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.3% compared to 10.9% in Gibsonville.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Mount clemens at 16.6%, compared to 7.4% in Gibsonville.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Gibsonville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.9% compared to 12.1% in Mount clemens.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.