Demographics details for Gibsonville, NC vs Chanhassen, MN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Gibsonville, NC vs Chanhassen, MN.
| Data | Gibsonville | Chanhassen |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 9,075 | 26,224 |
| Median Age | 40.3 years | 40.6 years |
| Median Income | $98,558 | $131,633 |
| Married Families | 43.0% | 47.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 4% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.4 | 3.4 |
Population Comparison: Gibsonville vs Chanhassen
- The population in Chanhassen is higher at 26,224, compared to 9,075 in Gibsonville.
- The median age in Chanhassen is higher at 40.6 years, compared to 40.3 years in Gibsonville.
- Chanhassen has a higher median income of $131,633, compared to $98,558 in Gibsonville.
- In Chanhassen, the percentage of married families is higher at 47.0%, compared to 43.0% in Gibsonville.
- Gibsonville has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 4% in Chanhassen.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Gibsonville and Chanhassen at 3.4%.
Demographics
Demographics Gibsonville vs Chanhassen provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Gibsonville | Chanhassen |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 29 | 1 |
| White | 69 | 84 |
| Asian | 1 | 7 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Gibsonville vs Chanhassen
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Gibsonville at 29% compared to 1% in Chanhassen.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Chanhassen at 84% compared to 69% in Gibsonville.
- In Chanhassen, the Asian population stands at 7%, greater than 1% in Gibsonville.
- Chanhassen has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 3%, compared to 0% in Gibsonville.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Chanhassen at 5%, compared to 1% in Gibsonville.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Gibsonville and Chanhassen at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Gibsonville | Chanhassen |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.4% | 11.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.8% | 6.4% |
| Depression | 24.2% | 19.8% |
| Smoking | 14.0% | 10.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.2% | 20.9% |
| Obesity | 32.7% | 29.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 5.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Gibsonville vs Chanhassen
- More residents in Gibsonville report poor mental health at 15.4% compared to 11.8% in Chanhassen.
- Depression is more prevalent in Gibsonville at 24.2% compared to 19.8% in Chanhassen.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Gibsonville at 14.0% compared to 10.0% in Chanhassen.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Chanhassen at 20.9% compared to 18.2% in Gibsonville.
- Obesity rates are higher in Gibsonville at 32.7% compared to 29.7% in Chanhassen.
- Disability percentages are higher in Gibsonville at 8.0% compared to 5.0% in Chanhassen.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Gibsonville | Chanhassen |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.1% (7) | 0.1% (31) |
| High School Diploma | 10.9% (985) | 5.7% (1,502) |
| Less than High School | 7.4% (672) | 1.7% (452) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 24.9% (2,261) | 42.7% (11,186) |
Education Levels Comparison: Gibsonville vs Chanhassen
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Gibsonville and Chanhassen at 0.1%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Gibsonville hold a high school diploma at 10.9% compared to 5.7% in Chanhassen.
- More residents in Gibsonville have less than a high school education at 7.4% compared to 1.7% in Chanhassen.
- In Chanhassen, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 42.7% compared to 24.9% in Gibsonville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.