Demographics details for Gibbon, NE vs Lexington, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Gibbon, NE vs Lexington, NC.
| Data | Gibbon | Lexington |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,900 | 19,679 |
| Median Age | 35.3 years | 38.6 years |
| Median Income | $69,276 | $36,868 |
| Married Families | 40.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Gibbon vs Lexington
- The population in Lexington is higher at 19,679, compared to 1,900 in Gibbon.
- The median age in Lexington is higher at 38.6 years, compared to 35.3 years in Gibbon.
- Gibbon has a higher median income of $69,276 compared to $36,868 in Lexington.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Gibbon at 40.0% compared to 31.0% in Lexington.
- The poverty level is higher in Lexington at 15%, compared to 0% in Gibbon.
- Lexington has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 2.5% in Gibbon.
Demographics
Demographics Gibbon vs Lexington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Gibbon | Lexington |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 31 |
| White | 68 | 38 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 4 |
| Hispanic | 27 | 16 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 11 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Gibbon vs Lexington
- In Lexington, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 31% compared to 1% in Gibbon.
- Gibbon has a higher percentage of White residents at 68% compared to 38% in Lexington.
- In Lexington, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 0% in Gibbon.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Gibbon at 27% compared to 16% in Lexington.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Lexington at 11%, compared to 4% in Gibbon.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Gibbon and Lexington at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Gibbon | Lexington |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 12.8% | 19.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.6% | 15.5% |
| Depression | 17.3% | 25.0% |
| Smoking | 15.4% | 24.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 21.7% | 13.8% |
| Obesity | 40.7% | 42.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Gibbon vs Lexington
- In Lexington, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 12.8% in Gibbon.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Lexington at 25.0% versus 17.3% in Gibbon.
- Lexington has a higher smoking rate at 24.1% compared to 15.4% in Gibbon.
- Binge drinking is more common in Gibbon at 21.7% compared to 13.8% in Lexington.
- Lexington has higher obesity rates at 42.7% compared to 40.7% in Gibbon.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Lexington at 18.0% compared to 14.0% in Gibbon.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Gibbon | Lexington |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.0% (38) | 2.7% (531) |
| High School Diploma | 17.5% (333) | 17.0% (3,355) |
| Less than High School | 21.6% (410) | 25.6% (5,036) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.9% (227) | 10.2% (2,009) |
Education Levels Comparison: Gibbon vs Lexington
- In Lexington, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 2.0% in Gibbon.
- A higher percentage of residents in Gibbon hold a high school diploma at 17.5% compared to 17.0% in Lexington.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Lexington at 25.6%, compared to 21.6% in Gibbon.
- A higher percentage of residents in Gibbon hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.9% compared to 10.2% in Lexington.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.