Demographics details for Gates, NC vs Bozeman, MT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Gates, NC vs Bozeman, MT.
Data | Gates | Bozeman |
---|---|---|
Population | 10,383 | 56,123 |
Median Age | 47.3 years | 28.2 years |
Median Income | $55,750 | $74,113 |
Married Families | 42.0% | 30.0% |
Poverty Level | 8% | 9% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.7 | 2.7 |
Population Comparison: Gates vs Bozeman
- The population in Bozeman is higher at 56,123, compared to 10,383 in Gates.
- Residents in Gates have a higher median age of 47.3 years compared to 28.2 years in Bozeman.
- Bozeman has a higher median income of $74,113, compared to $55,750 in Gates.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Gates at 42.0% compared to 30.0% in Bozeman.
- The poverty level is higher in Bozeman at 9%, compared to 8% in Gates.
- The unemployment rate in Gates is higher at 3.7%, compared to 2.7% in Bozeman.
Demographics
Demographics Gates vs Bozeman provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Gates | Bozeman |
---|---|---|
Black | 32 | 1 |
White | 60 | 86 |
Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
Hispanic | 3 | 5 |
Two or More Races | 4 | 5 |
American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Gates vs Bozeman
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Gates at 32% compared to 1% in Bozeman.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Bozeman at 86% compared to 60% in Gates.
- In Bozeman, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Gates.
- Bozeman has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 3% in Gates.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Bozeman at 5%, compared to 4% in Gates.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Gates and Bozeman at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Gates | Bozeman |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.3% | 14.5% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.1% | 9.0% |
Depression | 23.1% | 22.8% |
Smoking | 19.7% | 12.6% |
Binge Drinking | 17.1% | 23.1% |
Obesity | 39.1% | 24.8% |
Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Gates vs Bozeman
- More residents in Gates report poor mental health at 17.3% compared to 14.5% in Bozeman.
- Depression is more prevalent in Gates at 23.1% compared to 22.8% in Bozeman.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Gates at 19.7% compared to 12.6% in Bozeman.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Bozeman at 23.1% compared to 17.1% in Gates.
- Obesity rates are higher in Gates at 39.1% compared to 24.8% in Bozeman.
- Disability percentages are higher in Gates at 20.0% compared to 8.0% in Bozeman.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Gates | Bozeman |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.6% (59) | 0.0% (11) |
High School Diploma | 27.0% (2,806) | 5.7% (3,187) |
Less than High School | 11.5% (1,190) | 2.3% (1,316) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 6.6% (690) | 35.7% (20,038) |
Education Levels Comparison: Gates vs Bozeman
- A higher percentage of residents in Gates have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.0% in Bozeman.
- A higher percentage of residents in Gates hold a high school diploma at 27.0% compared to 5.7% in Bozeman.
- More residents in Gates have less than a high school education at 11.5% compared to 2.3% in Bozeman.
- In Bozeman, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 35.7% compared to 6.6% in Gates.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.