Demographics details for Garland, UT vs Lancaster, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Garland, UT vs Lancaster, CA.
| Data | Garland | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,613 | 169,185 |
| Median Age | 28.8 years | 33.6 years |
| Median Income | $56,332 | $71,367 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 14% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 8.2 |
Population Comparison: Garland vs Lancaster
- The population in Lancaster is higher at 169,185, compared to 2,613 in Garland.
- The median age in Lancaster is higher at 33.6 years, compared to 28.8 years in Garland.
- Lancaster has a higher median income of $71,367, compared to $56,332 in Garland.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Garland at 38.0% compared to 32.0% in Lancaster.
- The poverty level is higher in Lancaster at 15%, compared to 14% in Garland.
- Lancaster has a higher unemployment rate at 8.2% compared to 2.5% in Garland.
Demographics
Demographics Garland vs Lancaster provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Garland | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 21 |
| White | 69 | 10 |
| Asian | 1 | 4 |
| Hispanic | 20 | 46 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 18 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Garland vs Lancaster
- In Lancaster, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 21% compared to 0% in Garland.
- Garland has a higher percentage of White residents at 69% compared to 10% in Lancaster.
- In Lancaster, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 1% in Garland.
- Lancaster has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 46%, compared to 20% in Garland.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Lancaster at 18%, compared to 9% in Garland.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Garland and Lancaster at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Garland | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.5% | 17.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.3% | 13.5% |
| Depression | 24.2% | 17.7% |
| Smoking | 11.7% | 14.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 12.9% | 15.1% |
| Obesity | 35.3% | 32.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Garland vs Lancaster
- In Lancaster, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 17.5% in Garland.
- Depression is more prevalent in Garland at 24.2% compared to 17.7% in Lancaster.
- Lancaster has a higher smoking rate at 14.8% compared to 11.7% in Garland.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Lancaster at 15.1% compared to 12.9% in Garland.
- Obesity rates are higher in Garland at 35.3% compared to 32.9% in Lancaster.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Garland and Lancaster at 10.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Garland | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (9) | 2.0% (3,403) |
| High School Diploma | 19.6% (512) | 17.5% (29,555) |
| Less than High School | 13.5% (354) | 21.5% (36,421) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.9% (259) | 12.3% (20,861) |
Education Levels Comparison: Garland vs Lancaster
- In Lancaster, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.0% compared to 0.3% in Garland.
- A higher percentage of residents in Garland hold a high school diploma at 19.6% compared to 17.5% in Lancaster.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Lancaster at 21.5%, compared to 13.5% in Garland.
- In Lancaster, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.3% compared to 9.9% in Garland.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.