Demographics details for Garland, NC vs Gladewater, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Garland, NC vs Gladewater, TX.
Data | Garland | Gladewater |
---|---|---|
Population | 597 | 6,230 |
Median Age | 24.1 years | 33.3 years |
Median Income | $40,577 | $47,749 |
Married Families | 32.0% | 26.0% |
Poverty Level | 20% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Garland vs Gladewater
- The population in Gladewater is higher at 6,230, compared to 597 in Garland.
- The median age in Gladewater is higher at 33.3 years, compared to 24.1 years in Garland.
- Gladewater has a higher median income of $47,749, compared to $40,577 in Garland.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Garland at 32.0% compared to 26.0% in Gladewater.
- Garland has a higher poverty level at 20% compared to 10% in Gladewater.
- The unemployment rate in Garland is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.2% in Gladewater.
Demographics
Demographics Garland vs Gladewater provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Garland | Gladewater |
---|---|---|
Black | 82 | 17 |
White | -13 | 61 |
Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
Hispanic | 29 | 15 |
Two or More Races | 2 | 6 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Garland vs Gladewater
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Garland at 82% compared to 17% in Gladewater.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Gladewater at 61% compared to -13% in Garland.
- In Gladewater, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Garland.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Garland at 29% compared to 15% in Gladewater.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Gladewater at 6%, compared to 2% in Garland.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Garland and Gladewater at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Garland | Gladewater |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 21.3% | 19.6% |
Physical Health Not Good | 17.6% | 13.2% |
Depression | 25.3% | 25.8% |
Smoking | 27.4% | 20.9% |
Binge Drinking | 13.3% | 17.5% |
Obesity | 47.0% | 38.5% |
Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Garland vs Gladewater
- More residents in Garland report poor mental health at 21.3% compared to 19.6% in Gladewater.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Gladewater at 25.8% versus 25.3% in Garland.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Garland at 27.4% compared to 20.9% in Gladewater.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Gladewater at 17.5% compared to 13.3% in Garland.
- Obesity rates are higher in Garland at 47.0% compared to 38.5% in Gladewater.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Gladewater at 18.0% compared to 14.0% in Garland.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Garland | Gladewater |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.5% (30) |
High School Diploma | 22.1% (132) | 18.2% (1,135) |
Less than High School | 22.1% (132) | 24.6% (1,532) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 6.9% (41) | 7.6% (474) |
Education Levels Comparison: Garland vs Gladewater
- In Gladewater, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.0% in Garland.
- A higher percentage of residents in Garland hold a high school diploma at 22.1% compared to 18.2% in Gladewater.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Gladewater at 24.6%, compared to 22.1% in Garland.
- In Gladewater, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 7.6% compared to 6.9% in Garland.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.