Demographics details for Gallup, NM vs Bridgeport, CT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Gallup, NM vs Bridgeport, CT.
| Data | Gallup | Bridgeport |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 20,932 | 148,377 |
| Median Age | 34.1 years | 37.5 years |
| Median Income | $58,358 | $54,440 |
| Married Families | 28.0% | 29.0% |
| Poverty Level | 21% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 6.1 | 4.4 |
Population Comparison: Gallup vs Bridgeport
- The population in Bridgeport is higher at 148,377, compared to 20,932 in Gallup.
- The median age in Bridgeport is higher at 37.5 years, compared to 34.1 years in Gallup.
- Gallup has a higher median income of $58,358 compared to $54,440 in Bridgeport.
- In Bridgeport, the percentage of married families is higher at 29.0%, compared to 28.0% in Gallup.
- Gallup has a higher poverty level at 21% compared to 12% in Bridgeport.
- The unemployment rate in Gallup is higher at 6.1%, compared to 4.4% in Bridgeport.
Demographics
Demographics Gallup vs Bridgeport provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Gallup | Bridgeport |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 22 |
| White | 1 | 26 |
| Asian | 4 | 7 |
| Hispanic | 33 | 36 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 9 |
| American Indian | 51 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Gallup vs Bridgeport
- In Bridgeport, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 22% compared to 2% in Gallup.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Bridgeport at 26% compared to 1% in Gallup.
- In Bridgeport, the Asian population stands at 7%, greater than 4% in Gallup.
- Bridgeport has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 36%, compared to 33% in Gallup.
- Both Gallup and Bridgeport have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 9%.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Gallup at 51% compared to 0% in Bridgeport.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Gallup | Bridgeport |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.1% | 17.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.4% | 13.3% |
| Depression | 18.5% | 18.2% |
| Smoking | 18.6% | 18.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 12.9% | 13.7% |
| Obesity | 39.4% | 32.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Gallup vs Bridgeport
- More residents in Gallup report poor mental health at 18.1% compared to 17.0% in Bridgeport.
- Depression is more prevalent in Gallup at 18.5% compared to 18.2% in Bridgeport.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Gallup at 18.6% compared to 18.2% in Bridgeport.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Bridgeport at 13.7% compared to 12.9% in Gallup.
- Obesity rates are higher in Gallup at 39.4% compared to 32.7% in Bridgeport.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Gallup and Bridgeport at 15.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Gallup | Bridgeport |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (152) | 2.5% (3,659) |
| High School Diploma | 17.7% (3,703) | 18.7% (27,806) |
| Less than High School | 11.9% (2,501) | 23.9% (35,520) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.9% (3,119) | 16.8% (24,999) |
Education Levels Comparison: Gallup vs Bridgeport
- In Bridgeport, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.5% compared to 0.7% in Gallup.
- In Bridgeport, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.7% compared to 17.7% in Gallup.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Bridgeport at 23.9%, compared to 11.9% in Gallup.
- In Bridgeport, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.8% compared to 14.9% in Gallup.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.