Demographics details for Gallatin, TN vs Riverbank, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Gallatin, TN vs Riverbank, CA.
| Data | Gallatin | Riverbank |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 48,194 | 24,826 |
| Median Age | 37.8 years | 33.6 years |
| Median Income | $68,548 | $89,504 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.3 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Gallatin vs Riverbank
- In Gallatin, the population is higher at 48,194, compared to 24,826 in Riverbank.
- Residents in Gallatin have a higher median age of 37.8 years compared to 33.6 years in Riverbank.
- Riverbank has a higher median income of $89,504, compared to $68,548 in Gallatin.
- In Riverbank, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 37.0% in Gallatin.
- Gallatin has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 10% in Riverbank.
- Riverbank has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 3.3% in Gallatin.
Demographics
Demographics Gallatin vs Riverbank provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Gallatin | Riverbank |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 15 | 1 |
| White | 67 | 13 |
| Asian | 2 | 6 |
| Hispanic | 9 | 55 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 23 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Gallatin vs Riverbank
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Gallatin at 15% compared to 1% in Riverbank.
- Gallatin has a higher percentage of White residents at 67% compared to 13% in Riverbank.
- In Riverbank, the Asian population stands at 6%, greater than 2% in Gallatin.
- Riverbank has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 55%, compared to 9% in Gallatin.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Riverbank at 23%, compared to 7% in Gallatin.
- In Riverbank, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Gallatin.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Gallatin | Riverbank |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.0% | 17.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.2% | 13.2% |
| Depression | 27.7% | 21.0% |
| Smoking | 20.8% | 15.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.7% | 16.4% |
| Obesity | 37.2% | 35.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Gallatin vs Riverbank
- More residents in Gallatin report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 17.2% in Riverbank.
- Depression is more prevalent in Gallatin at 27.7% compared to 21.0% in Riverbank.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Gallatin at 20.8% compared to 15.0% in Riverbank.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Riverbank at 16.4% compared to 14.7% in Gallatin.
- Obesity rates are higher in Gallatin at 37.2% compared to 35.0% in Riverbank.
- Disability percentages are higher in Gallatin at 11.0% compared to 10.0% in Riverbank.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Gallatin | Riverbank |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (596) | 3.1% (766) |
| High School Diploma | 13.9% (6,695) | 15.2% (3,764) |
| Less than High School | 11.6% (5,600) | 22.2% (5,505) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.6% (9,464) | 11.3% (2,804) |
Education Levels Comparison: Gallatin vs Riverbank
- In Riverbank, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.1% compared to 1.2% in Gallatin.
- In Riverbank, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.2% compared to 13.9% in Gallatin.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Riverbank at 22.2%, compared to 11.6% in Gallatin.
- A higher percentage of residents in Gallatin hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.6% compared to 11.3% in Riverbank.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.