Demographics details for Gallatin, TN vs Loves park, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Gallatin, TN vs Loves park, IL.
| Data | Gallatin | Loves park |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 48,194 | 23,365 |
| Median Age | 37.8 years | 36.6 years |
| Median Income | $68,548 | $56,370 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.3 | 3.6 |
Population Comparison: Gallatin vs Loves park
- In Gallatin, the population is higher at 48,194, compared to 23,365 in Loves park.
- Residents in Gallatin have a higher median age of 37.8 years compared to 36.6 years in Loves park.
- Gallatin has a higher median income of $68,548 compared to $56,370 in Loves park.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Gallatin at 37.0% compared to 35.0% in Loves park.
- Gallatin has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 9% in Loves park.
- Loves park has a higher unemployment rate at 3.6% compared to 3.3% in Gallatin.
Demographics
Demographics Gallatin vs Loves park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Gallatin | Loves park |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 15 | 7 |
| White | 67 | 71 |
| Asian | 2 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 9 | 10 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 9 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Gallatin vs Loves park
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Gallatin at 15% compared to 7% in Loves park.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Loves park at 71% compared to 67% in Gallatin.
- In Loves park, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 2% in Gallatin.
- Loves park has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 10%, compared to 9% in Gallatin.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Loves park at 9%, compared to 7% in Gallatin.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Gallatin and Loves park at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Gallatin | Loves park |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.0% | 16.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.2% | 11.3% |
| Depression | 27.7% | 21.3% |
| Smoking | 20.8% | 17.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.7% | 17.0% |
| Obesity | 37.2% | 39.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Gallatin vs Loves park
- More residents in Gallatin report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 16.3% in Loves park.
- Depression is more prevalent in Gallatin at 27.7% compared to 21.3% in Loves park.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Gallatin at 20.8% compared to 17.0% in Loves park.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Loves park at 17.0% compared to 14.7% in Gallatin.
- Loves park has higher obesity rates at 39.4% compared to 37.2% in Gallatin.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Loves park at 14.0% compared to 11.0% in Gallatin.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Gallatin | Loves park |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (596) | 0.4% (97) |
| High School Diploma | 13.9% (6,695) | 17.1% (3,994) |
| Less than High School | 11.6% (5,600) | 9.7% (2,262) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.6% (9,464) | 17.4% (4,064) |
Education Levels Comparison: Gallatin vs Loves park
- A higher percentage of residents in Gallatin have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.4% in Loves park.
- In Loves park, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.1% compared to 13.9% in Gallatin.
- More residents in Gallatin have less than a high school education at 11.6% compared to 9.7% in Loves park.
- A higher percentage of residents in Gallatin hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.6% compared to 17.4% in Loves park.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.