Demographics details for Gallatin gateway, MT vs Corinth, MS

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Gallatin gateway, MT vs Corinth, MS.

Data Gallatin gateway Corinth
Population 886 14,312
Median Age 43.4 years 42.1 years
Median Income $98,750 $40,546
Married Families 47.0% 32.0%
Poverty Level Data is updating 20%
Unemployment Rate 3.2 4.5

Population Comparison: Gallatin gateway vs Corinth

  • The population in Corinth is higher at 14,312, compared to 886 in Gallatin gateway.
  • Residents in Gallatin gateway have a higher median age of 43.4 years compared to 42.1 years in Corinth.
  • Gallatin gateway has a higher median income of $98,750 compared to $40,546 in Corinth.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Gallatin gateway at 47.0% compared to 32.0% in Corinth.
  • The poverty level is higher in Corinth at 20%, compared to 0% in Gallatin gateway.
  • Corinth has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.2% in Gallatin gateway.

Demographics

Demographics Gallatin gateway vs Corinth provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Gallatin gateway Corinth
Black Data is updating 17
White 90 72
Asian 1 Data is updating
Hispanic 4 5
Two or More Races 5 5
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Gallatin gateway vs Corinth

  • In Corinth, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 17% compared to 0% in Gallatin gateway.
  • Gallatin gateway has a higher percentage of White residents at 90% compared to 72% in Corinth.
  • The Asian population is larger in Gallatin gateway at 1% compared to 0% in Corinth.
  • Corinth has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 4% in Gallatin gateway.
  • Both Gallatin gateway and Corinth have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 5%.
  • In Corinth, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Gallatin gateway.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Gallatin gateway Corinth
Mental Health Not Good 13.1% 17.5%
Physical Health Not Good 7.9% 13.0%
Depression 21.5% 23.5%
Smoking 10.6% 21.4%
Binge Drinking 24.4% 14.7%
Obesity 23.0% 39.5%
Disability Percentage 10.0% 23.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Gallatin gateway vs Corinth

  • In Corinth, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.5% compared to 13.1% in Gallatin gateway.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Corinth at 23.5% versus 21.5% in Gallatin gateway.
  • Corinth has a higher smoking rate at 21.4% compared to 10.6% in Gallatin gateway.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Gallatin gateway at 24.4% compared to 14.7% in Corinth.
  • Corinth has higher obesity rates at 39.5% compared to 23.0% in Gallatin gateway.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Corinth at 23.0% compared to 10.0% in Gallatin gateway.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Gallatin gateway Corinth
No Schooling 1.1% (10) 0.6% (80)
High School Diploma 12.1% (107) 14.4% (2,059)
Less than High School 11.6% (103) 22.8% (3,266)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 29.2% (259) 17.8% (2,547)

Education Levels Comparison: Gallatin gateway vs Corinth

  • A higher percentage of residents in Gallatin gateway have no formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.6% in Corinth.
  • In Corinth, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 14.4% compared to 12.1% in Gallatin gateway.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Corinth at 22.8%, compared to 11.6% in Gallatin gateway.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Gallatin gateway hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 29.2% compared to 17.8% in Corinth.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.