Demographics details for Freeport, PA vs Cleveland, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Freeport, PA vs Cleveland, MS.
| Data | Freeport | Cleveland |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,715 | 10,545 |
| Median Age | 38.1 years | 33.8 years |
| Median Income | $37,336 | $42,005 |
| Married Families | 30.0% | 27.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 24% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 5.6 |
Population Comparison: Freeport vs Cleveland
- The population in Cleveland is higher at 10,545, compared to 1,715 in Freeport.
- Residents in Freeport have a higher median age of 38.1 years compared to 33.8 years in Cleveland.
- Cleveland has a higher median income of $42,005, compared to $37,336 in Freeport.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Freeport at 30.0% compared to 27.0% in Cleveland.
- The poverty level is higher in Cleveland at 24%, compared to 0% in Freeport.
- Cleveland has a higher unemployment rate at 5.6% compared to 4.5% in Freeport.
Demographics
Demographics Freeport vs Cleveland provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Freeport | Cleveland |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 56 |
| White | 95 | 36 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Freeport vs Cleveland
- In Cleveland, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 56% compared to 2% in Freeport.
- Freeport has a higher percentage of White residents at 95% compared to 36% in Cleveland.
- In Cleveland, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Freeport.
- Cleveland has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 1%, compared to 0% in Freeport.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Cleveland at 5%, compared to 3% in Freeport.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Freeport and Cleveland at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Freeport | Cleveland |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.0% | 17.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.3% | 13.8% |
| Depression | 24.1% | 20.4% |
| Smoking | 20.7% | 21.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.3% | 12.7% |
| Obesity | 36.7% | 41.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Freeport vs Cleveland
- More residents in Freeport report poor mental health at 18.0% compared to 17.6% in Cleveland.
- Depression is more prevalent in Freeport at 24.1% compared to 20.4% in Cleveland.
- Cleveland has a higher smoking rate at 21.0% compared to 20.7% in Freeport.
- Binge drinking is more common in Freeport at 18.3% compared to 12.7% in Cleveland.
- Cleveland has higher obesity rates at 41.4% compared to 36.7% in Freeport.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Cleveland at 20.0% compared to 17.0% in Freeport.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Freeport | Cleveland |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (8) | 0.9% (99) |
| High School Diploma | 28.3% (485) | 10.0% (1,059) |
| Less than High School | 2.6% (44) | 13.3% (1,404) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.1% (207) | 21.3% (2,242) |
Education Levels Comparison: Freeport vs Cleveland
- In Cleveland, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.5% in Freeport.
- A higher percentage of residents in Freeport hold a high school diploma at 28.3% compared to 10.0% in Cleveland.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Cleveland at 13.3%, compared to 2.6% in Freeport.
- In Cleveland, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.3% compared to 12.1% in Freeport.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.