Demographics details for Freeland, MI vs Jeffersonville, IN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Freeland, MI vs Jeffersonville, IN.
Data | Freeland | Jeffersonville |
---|---|---|
Population | 7,357 | 51,030 |
Median Age | 37.4 years | 38.6 years |
Median Income | $95,478 | $67,566 |
Married Families | 39.0% | 37.0% |
Poverty Level | 4% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.1 |
Population Comparison: Freeland vs Jeffersonville
- The population in Jeffersonville is higher at 51,030, compared to 7,357 in Freeland.
- The median age in Jeffersonville is higher at 38.6 years, compared to 37.4 years in Freeland.
- Freeland has a higher median income of $95,478 compared to $67,566 in Jeffersonville.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Freeland at 39.0% compared to 37.0% in Jeffersonville.
- The poverty level is higher in Jeffersonville at 10%, compared to 4% in Freeland.
- Jeffersonville has a higher unemployment rate at 4.1% compared to 3.5% in Freeland.
Demographics
Demographics Freeland vs Jeffersonville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Freeland | Jeffersonville |
---|---|---|
Black | 9 | 12 |
White | 76 | 75 |
Asian | 1 | 1 |
Hispanic | 5 | 5 |
Two or More Races | 8 | 7 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Freeland vs Jeffersonville
- In Jeffersonville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 12% compared to 9% in Freeland.
- Freeland has a higher percentage of White residents at 76% compared to 75% in Jeffersonville.
- Both Freeland and Jeffersonville have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Freeland and Jeffersonville at 5%.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Freeland at 8% compared to 7% in Jeffersonville.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Freeland at 1% compared to 0% in Jeffersonville.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Freeland | Jeffersonville |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 14.5% | 17.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.1% | 11.7% |
Depression | 20.4% | 23.5% |
Smoking | 14.2% | 20.2% |
Binge Drinking | 20.3% | 16.9% |
Obesity | 37.8% | 40.2% |
Disability Percentage | 4.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Freeland vs Jeffersonville
- In Jeffersonville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.3% compared to 14.5% in Freeland.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Jeffersonville at 23.5% versus 20.4% in Freeland.
- Jeffersonville has a higher smoking rate at 20.2% compared to 14.2% in Freeland.
- Binge drinking is more common in Freeland at 20.3% compared to 16.9% in Jeffersonville.
- Jeffersonville has higher obesity rates at 40.2% compared to 37.8% in Freeland.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Jeffersonville at 13.0% compared to 4.0% in Freeland.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Freeland | Jeffersonville |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.7% (51) | 0.6% (293) |
High School Diploma | 13.8% (1,014) | 18.6% (9,472) |
Less than High School | 7.4% (542) | 9.7% (4,952) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.8% (1,605) | 16.9% (8,649) |
Education Levels Comparison: Freeland vs Jeffersonville
- A higher percentage of residents in Freeland have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.6% in Jeffersonville.
- In Jeffersonville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.6% compared to 13.8% in Freeland.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Jeffersonville at 9.7%, compared to 7.4% in Freeland.
- A higher percentage of residents in Freeland hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.8% compared to 16.9% in Jeffersonville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.