Demographics details for Fredonia, AZ vs Mount juliet, TN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fredonia, AZ vs Mount juliet, TN.
| Data | Fredonia | Mount juliet |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,314 | 42,548 |
| Median Age | 45.6 years | 39.2 years |
| Median Income | $57,762 | $108,066 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 45.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.1 | 2.8 |
Population Comparison: Fredonia vs Mount juliet
- The population in Mount juliet is higher at 42,548, compared to 1,314 in Fredonia.
- Residents in Fredonia have a higher median age of 45.6 years compared to 39.2 years in Mount juliet.
- Mount juliet has a higher median income of $108,066, compared to $57,762 in Fredonia.
- In Mount juliet, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 35.0% in Fredonia.
- Fredonia has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 5% in Mount juliet.
- The unemployment rate in Fredonia is higher at 5.1%, compared to 2.8% in Mount juliet.
Demographics
Demographics Fredonia vs Mount juliet provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fredonia | Mount juliet |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 7 |
| White | 74 | 79 |
| Asian | 1 | 4 |
| Hispanic | 14 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 4 |
| American Indian | 4 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fredonia vs Mount juliet
- In Mount juliet, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 7% compared to 0% in Fredonia.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Mount juliet at 79% compared to 74% in Fredonia.
- In Mount juliet, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 1% in Fredonia.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Fredonia at 14% compared to 6% in Mount juliet.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Fredonia at 7% compared to 4% in Mount juliet.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Fredonia at 4% compared to 0% in Mount juliet.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fredonia | Mount juliet |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.5% | 16.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.0% | 10.0% |
| Depression | 22.2% | 25.7% |
| Smoking | 17.6% | 15.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.8% | 16.8% |
| Obesity | 25.9% | 29.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 22.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fredonia vs Mount juliet
- More residents in Fredonia report poor mental health at 18.5% compared to 16.0% in Mount juliet.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Mount juliet at 25.7% versus 22.2% in Fredonia.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Fredonia at 17.6% compared to 15.2% in Mount juliet.
- Binge drinking is more common in Fredonia at 17.8% compared to 16.8% in Mount juliet.
- Mount juliet has higher obesity rates at 29.9% compared to 25.9% in Fredonia.
- Disability percentages are higher in Fredonia at 22.0% compared to 7.0% in Mount juliet.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fredonia | Mount juliet |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.4% (173) |
| High School Diploma | 11.2% (147) | 10.4% (4,408) |
| Less than High School | 13.5% (178) | 3.9% (1,653) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.0% (92) | 29.4% (12,510) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fredonia vs Mount juliet
- In Mount juliet, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.0% in Fredonia.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fredonia hold a high school diploma at 11.2% compared to 10.4% in Mount juliet.
- More residents in Fredonia have less than a high school education at 13.5% compared to 3.9% in Mount juliet.
- In Mount juliet, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 29.4% compared to 7.0% in Fredonia.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.