Demographics details for Fredericksburg, IA vs Wadesboro, NC

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Fredericksburg, IA vs Wadesboro, NC.

Data Fredericksburg Wadesboro
Population 984 4,966
Median Age 38.8 years 38.3 years
Median Income $62,583 $32,022
Married Families 50.0% 20.0%
Poverty Level Data is updating Data is updating
Unemployment Rate 3.5 5.0

Population Comparison: Fredericksburg vs Wadesboro

  • The population in Wadesboro is higher at 4,966, compared to 984 in Fredericksburg.
  • Residents in Fredericksburg have a higher median age of 38.8 years compared to 38.3 years in Wadesboro.
  • Fredericksburg has a higher median income of $62,583 compared to $32,022 in Wadesboro.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Fredericksburg at 50.0% compared to 20.0% in Wadesboro.
  • The poverty level is identical in both Fredericksburg and Wadesboro at 0%.
  • Wadesboro has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 3.5% in Fredericksburg.

Demographics

Demographics Fredericksburg vs Wadesboro provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Fredericksburg Wadesboro
Black Data is updating 70
White 83 25
Asian Data is updating 5
Hispanic 5 Data is updating
Two or More Races 10 Data is updating
American Indian 2 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Fredericksburg vs Wadesboro

  • In Wadesboro, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 70% compared to 0% in Fredericksburg.
  • Fredericksburg has a higher percentage of White residents at 83% compared to 25% in Wadesboro.
  • In Wadesboro, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 0% in Fredericksburg.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Fredericksburg at 5% compared to 0% in Wadesboro.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Fredericksburg at 10% compared to 0% in Wadesboro.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Fredericksburg at 2% compared to 0% in Wadesboro.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Fredericksburg Wadesboro
Mental Health Not Good 15.0% 18.1%
Physical Health Not Good 9.1% 13.7%
Depression 18.6% 21.6%
Smoking 16.5% 22.2%
Binge Drinking 22.7% 13.9%
Obesity 38.2% 44.3%
Disability Percentage 21.0% 20.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Fredericksburg vs Wadesboro

  • In Wadesboro, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.1% compared to 15.0% in Fredericksburg.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Wadesboro at 21.6% versus 18.6% in Fredericksburg.
  • Wadesboro has a higher smoking rate at 22.2% compared to 16.5% in Fredericksburg.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Fredericksburg at 22.7% compared to 13.9% in Wadesboro.
  • Wadesboro has higher obesity rates at 44.3% compared to 38.2% in Fredericksburg.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Fredericksburg at 21.0% compared to 20.0% in Wadesboro.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Fredericksburg Wadesboro
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 25.0% (246) 19.2% (953)
Less than High School 11.7% (115) 11.8% (587)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 12.3% (121) 9.5% (472)

Education Levels Comparison: Fredericksburg vs Wadesboro

  • The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Fredericksburg and Wadesboro at 0.0%.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Fredericksburg hold a high school diploma at 25.0% compared to 19.2% in Wadesboro.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Wadesboro at 11.8%, compared to 11.7% in Fredericksburg.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Fredericksburg hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.3% compared to 9.5% in Wadesboro.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.