Demographics details for Frazer, MT vs Union city, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Frazer, MT vs Union city, GA.
| Data | Frazer | Union city |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 365 | 27,895 |
| Median Age | 26.9 years | 32.7 years |
| Median Income | $34,375 | $46,696 |
| Married Families | 26.0% | 17.0% |
| Poverty Level | 35% | 16% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 6.1 |
Population Comparison: Frazer vs Union city
- The population in Union city is higher at 27,895, compared to 365 in Frazer.
- The median age in Union city is higher at 32.7 years, compared to 26.9 years in Frazer.
- Union city has a higher median income of $46,696, compared to $34,375 in Frazer.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Frazer at 26.0% compared to 17.0% in Union city.
- Frazer has a higher poverty level at 35% compared to 16% in Union city.
- Union city has a higher unemployment rate at 6.1% compared to 5.2% in Frazer.
Demographics
Demographics Frazer vs Union city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Frazer | Union city |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 85 |
| White | 3 | 6 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 2 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 4 |
| American Indian | 93 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Frazer vs Union city
- In Union city, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 85% compared to 0% in Frazer.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Union city at 6% compared to 3% in Frazer.
- Both Frazer and Union city have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Union city has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 2% in Frazer.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Union city at 4%, compared to 2% in Frazer.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Frazer at 93% compared to 0% in Union city.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Frazer | Union city |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.5% | 16.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.8% | 12.2% |
| Depression | 22.9% | 17.2% |
| Smoking | 25.7% | 18.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 21.9% | 13.5% |
| Obesity | 42.3% | 36.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 22.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Frazer vs Union city
- More residents in Frazer report poor mental health at 19.5% compared to 16.7% in Union city.
- Depression is more prevalent in Frazer at 22.9% compared to 17.2% in Union city.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Frazer at 25.7% compared to 18.0% in Union city.
- Binge drinking is more common in Frazer at 21.9% compared to 13.5% in Union city.
- Obesity rates are higher in Frazer at 42.3% compared to 36.6% in Union city.
- Disability percentages are higher in Frazer at 22.0% compared to 12.0% in Union city.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Frazer | Union city |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.5% (129) |
| High School Diploma | 20.5% (75) | 13.2% (3,681) |
| Less than High School | 8.5% (31) | 7.8% (2,166) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 6.6% (24) | 17.3% (4,828) |
Education Levels Comparison: Frazer vs Union city
- In Union city, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.0% in Frazer.
- A higher percentage of residents in Frazer hold a high school diploma at 20.5% compared to 13.2% in Union city.
- More residents in Frazer have less than a high school education at 8.5% compared to 7.8% in Union city.
- In Union city, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.3% compared to 6.6% in Frazer.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.