Demographics details for Franklinton, LA vs Sterling heights, MI

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Franklinton, LA vs Sterling heights, MI.

Data Franklinton Sterling heights
Population 3,593 132,567
Median Age 39.5 years 41.2 years
Median Income $31,645 $75,381
Married Families 26.0% 45.0%
Poverty Level 19% 8%
Unemployment Rate 4.0 4.7

Population Comparison: Franklinton vs Sterling heights

  • The population in Sterling heights is higher at 132,567, compared to 3,593 in Franklinton.
  • The median age in Sterling heights is higher at 41.2 years, compared to 39.5 years in Franklinton.
  • Sterling heights has a higher median income of $75,381, compared to $31,645 in Franklinton.
  • In Sterling heights, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 26.0% in Franklinton.
  • Franklinton has a higher poverty level at 19% compared to 8% in Sterling heights.
  • Sterling heights has a higher unemployment rate at 4.7% compared to 4.0% in Franklinton.

Demographics

Demographics Franklinton vs Sterling heights provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Franklinton Sterling heights
Black 54 6
White 41 79
Asian Data is updating 9
Hispanic 1 2
Two or More Races 4 4
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Franklinton vs Sterling heights

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Franklinton at 54% compared to 6% in Sterling heights.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Sterling heights at 79% compared to 41% in Franklinton.
  • In Sterling heights, the Asian population stands at 9%, greater than 0% in Franklinton.
  • Sterling heights has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 2%, compared to 1% in Franklinton.
  • Both Franklinton and Sterling heights have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 4%.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Franklinton and Sterling heights at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Franklinton Sterling heights
Mental Health Not Good 21.7% 17.8%
Physical Health Not Good 16.6% 11.4%
Depression 25.8% 25.5%
Smoking 27.5% 19.8%
Binge Drinking 14.8% 17.7%
Obesity 46.9% 36.6%
Disability Percentage 33.0% 13.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Franklinton vs Sterling heights

  • More residents in Franklinton report poor mental health at 21.7% compared to 17.8% in Sterling heights.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Franklinton at 25.8% compared to 25.5% in Sterling heights.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Franklinton at 27.5% compared to 19.8% in Sterling heights.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Sterling heights at 17.7% compared to 14.8% in Franklinton.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Franklinton at 46.9% compared to 36.6% in Sterling heights.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Franklinton at 33.0% compared to 13.0% in Sterling heights.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Franklinton Sterling heights
No Schooling 0.8% (30) 2.4% (3,134)
High School Diploma 23.5% (844) 18.8% (24,937)
Less than High School 20.5% (737) 16.6% (22,008)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 5.2% (187) 22.3% (29,518)

Education Levels Comparison: Franklinton vs Sterling heights

  • In Sterling heights, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.4% compared to 0.8% in Franklinton.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Franklinton hold a high school diploma at 23.5% compared to 18.8% in Sterling heights.
  • More residents in Franklinton have less than a high school education at 20.5% compared to 16.6% in Sterling heights.
  • In Sterling heights, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.3% compared to 5.2% in Franklinton.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.