Demographics details for Franklin park, IL vs Clemmons, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Franklin park, IL vs Clemmons, NC.
Data | Franklin park | Clemmons |
---|---|---|
Population | 18,059 | 21,823 |
Median Age | 36.5 years | 42.4 years |
Median Income | $74,167 | $75,667 |
Married Families | 36.0% | 45.0% |
Poverty Level | 9% | 5% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.1 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Franklin park vs Clemmons
- The population in Clemmons is higher at 21,823, compared to 18,059 in Franklin park.
- The median age in Clemmons is higher at 42.4 years, compared to 36.5 years in Franklin park.
- Clemmons has a higher median income of $75,667, compared to $74,167 in Franklin park.
- In Clemmons, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 36.0% in Franklin park.
- Franklin park has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 5% in Clemmons.
- The unemployment rate in Franklin park is higher at 5.1%, compared to 3.5% in Clemmons.
Demographics
Demographics Franklin park vs Clemmons provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Franklin park | Clemmons |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 6 |
White | 10 | 76 |
Asian | 5 | 5 |
Hispanic | 59 | 6 |
Two or More Races | 23 | 6 |
American Indian | 2 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Franklin park vs Clemmons
- In Clemmons, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 6% compared to 1% in Franklin park.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Clemmons at 76% compared to 10% in Franklin park.
- Both Franklin park and Clemmons have the same percentage of Asian residents at 5%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Franklin park at 59% compared to 6% in Clemmons.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Franklin park at 23% compared to 6% in Clemmons.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Franklin park at 2% compared to 1% in Clemmons.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Franklin park | Clemmons |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 14.2% | 13.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.9% | 8.8% |
Depression | 17.7% | 23.7% |
Smoking | 14.4% | 12.5% |
Binge Drinking | 18.9% | 17.8% |
Obesity | 30.9% | 29.7% |
Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Franklin park vs Clemmons
- More residents in Franklin park report poor mental health at 14.2% compared to 13.9% in Clemmons.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Clemmons at 23.7% versus 17.7% in Franklin park.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Franklin park at 14.4% compared to 12.5% in Clemmons.
- Binge drinking is more common in Franklin park at 18.9% compared to 17.8% in Clemmons.
- Obesity rates are higher in Franklin park at 30.9% compared to 29.7% in Clemmons.
- Disability percentages are higher in Franklin park at 11.0% compared to 10.0% in Clemmons.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Franklin park | Clemmons |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.5% (453) | 0.6% (140) |
High School Diploma | 17.0% (3,067) | 9.3% (2,040) |
Less than High School | 30.2% (5,452) | 6.5% (1,429) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.7% (2,297) | 34.0% (7,418) |
Education Levels Comparison: Franklin park vs Clemmons
- A higher percentage of residents in Franklin park have no formal schooling at 2.5% compared to 0.6% in Clemmons.
- A higher percentage of residents in Franklin park hold a high school diploma at 17.0% compared to 9.3% in Clemmons.
- More residents in Franklin park have less than a high school education at 30.2% compared to 6.5% in Clemmons.
- In Clemmons, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 34.0% compared to 12.7% in Franklin park.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.