Demographics details for Fountain, CO vs Zanesville, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fountain, CO vs Zanesville, OH.
| Data | Fountain | Zanesville |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 28,907 | 24,600 |
| Median Age | 30.4 years | 38.1 years |
| Median Income | $80,311 | $40,927 |
| Married Families | 44.0% | 25.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.6 | 6.0 |
Population Comparison: Fountain vs Zanesville
- In Fountain, the population is higher at 28,907, compared to 24,600 in Zanesville.
- The median age in Zanesville is higher at 38.1 years, compared to 30.4 years in Fountain.
- Fountain has a higher median income of $80,311 compared to $40,927 in Zanesville.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Fountain at 44.0% compared to 25.0% in Zanesville.
- The poverty level is identical in both Fountain and Zanesville at 11%.
- Zanesville has a higher unemployment rate at 6.0% compared to 4.6% in Fountain.
Demographics
Demographics Fountain vs Zanesville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fountain | Zanesville |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 9 | 9 |
| White | 47 | 79 |
| Asian | 2 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 28 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 13 | 8 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fountain vs Zanesville
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Fountain and Zanesville at 9%.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Zanesville at 79% compared to 47% in Fountain.
- The Asian population is larger in Fountain at 2% compared to 1% in Zanesville.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Fountain at 28% compared to 3% in Zanesville.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Fountain at 13% compared to 8% in Zanesville.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Fountain at 1% compared to 0% in Zanesville.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fountain | Zanesville |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.7% | 20.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.3% | 15.5% |
| Depression | 25.4% | 26.7% |
| Smoking | 15.7% | 25.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.9% | 16.6% |
| Obesity | 29.4% | 47.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fountain vs Zanesville
- In Zanesville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.8% compared to 16.7% in Fountain.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Zanesville at 26.7% versus 25.4% in Fountain.
- Zanesville has a higher smoking rate at 25.8% compared to 15.7% in Fountain.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Zanesville at 16.6% compared to 15.9% in Fountain.
- Zanesville has higher obesity rates at 47.8% compared to 29.4% in Fountain.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Zanesville at 19.0% compared to 10.0% in Fountain.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fountain | Zanesville |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (180) | 1.6% (389) |
| High School Diploma | 12.0% (3,482) | 26.5% (6,510) |
| Less than High School | 5.9% (1,717) | 17.8% (4,373) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.2% (5,549) | 9.0% (2,214) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fountain vs Zanesville
- In Zanesville, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.6% in Fountain.
- In Zanesville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 26.5% compared to 12.0% in Fountain.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Zanesville at 17.8%, compared to 5.9% in Fountain.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fountain hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.2% compared to 9.0% in Zanesville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.