Demographics details for Fountain hills, AZ vs Parker, CO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fountain hills, AZ vs Parker, CO.
| Data | Fountain hills | Parker |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 23,785 | 61,222 |
| Median Age | 60.2 years | 35.7 years |
| Median Income | $100,317 | $126,615 |
| Married Families | 58.0% | 45.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.9 |
Population Comparison: Fountain hills vs Parker
- The population in Parker is higher at 61,222, compared to 23,785 in Fountain hills.
- Residents in Fountain hills have a higher median age of 60.2 years compared to 35.7 years in Parker.
- Parker has a higher median income of $126,615, compared to $100,317 in Fountain hills.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Fountain hills at 58.0% compared to 45.0% in Parker.
- The poverty level is higher in Parker at 5%, compared to 0% in Fountain hills.
- Parker has a higher unemployment rate at 3.9% compared to 3.2% in Fountain hills.
Demographics
Demographics Fountain hills vs Parker provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fountain hills | Parker |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 2 |
| White | 89 | 73 |
| Asian | 2 | 5 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 12 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 8 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fountain hills vs Parker
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Fountain hills and Parker at 2%.
- Fountain hills has a higher percentage of White residents at 89% compared to 73% in Parker.
- In Parker, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 2% in Fountain hills.
- Parker has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 12%, compared to 3% in Fountain hills.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Parker at 8%, compared to 4% in Fountain hills.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fountain hills and Parker at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fountain hills | Parker |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.1% | 12.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.0% | 8.1% |
| Depression | 19.7% | 19.2% |
| Smoking | 10.7% | 9.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.8% | 18.9% |
| Obesity | 26.5% | 23.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 5.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fountain hills vs Parker
- More residents in Fountain hills report poor mental health at 15.1% compared to 12.9% in Parker.
- Depression is more prevalent in Fountain hills at 19.7% compared to 19.2% in Parker.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Fountain hills at 10.7% compared to 9.8% in Parker.
- Binge drinking is more common in Fountain hills at 19.8% compared to 18.9% in Parker.
- Obesity rates are higher in Fountain hills at 26.5% compared to 23.7% in Parker.
- Disability percentages are higher in Fountain hills at 10.0% compared to 5.0% in Parker.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fountain hills | Parker |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (88) | 0.7% (432) |
| High School Diploma | 11.7% (2,782) | 6.8% (4,185) |
| Less than High School | 3.7% (876) | 4.4% (2,679) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 42.2% (10,044) | 32.8% (20,066) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fountain hills vs Parker
- In Parker, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.4% in Fountain hills.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fountain hills hold a high school diploma at 11.7% compared to 6.8% in Parker.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Parker at 4.4%, compared to 3.7% in Fountain hills.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fountain hills hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 42.2% compared to 32.8% in Parker.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.