Demographics details for Fort washington, MD vs Culver city, CA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Fort washington, MD vs Culver city, CA.

Data Fort washington Culver city
Population 25,825 39,515
Median Age 44.1 years 41.5 years
Median Income $143,623 $114,429
Married Families 43.0% 43.0%
Poverty Level 5% 9%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 5.8

Population Comparison: Fort washington vs Culver city

  • The population in Culver city is higher at 39,515, compared to 25,825 in Fort washington.
  • Residents in Fort washington have a higher median age of 44.1 years compared to 41.5 years in Culver city.
  • Fort washington has a higher median income of $143,623 compared to $114,429 in Culver city.
  • The percentage of married families is the same in both Fort washington and Culver city at 43.0%.
  • The poverty level is higher in Culver city at 9%, compared to 5% in Fort washington.
  • Culver city has a higher unemployment rate at 5.8% compared to 3.5% in Fort washington.

Demographics

Demographics Fort washington vs Culver city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Fort washington Culver city
Black 61 8
White 8 38
Asian 8 18
Hispanic 17 21
Two or More Races 6 15
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Fort washington vs Culver city

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fort washington at 61% compared to 8% in Culver city.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Culver city at 38% compared to 8% in Fort washington.
  • In Culver city, the Asian population stands at 18%, greater than 8% in Fort washington.
  • Culver city has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 21%, compared to 17% in Fort washington.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Culver city at 15%, compared to 6% in Fort washington.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fort washington and Culver city at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Fort washington Culver city
Mental Health Not Good 12.5% 13.1%
Physical Health Not Good 7.9% 8.1%
Depression 11.6% 15.2%
Smoking 9.6% 7.5%
Binge Drinking 12.0% 16.5%
Obesity 37.7% 24.1%
Disability Percentage 9.0% 9.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Fort washington vs Culver city

  • In Culver city, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 13.1% compared to 12.5% in Fort washington.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Culver city at 15.2% versus 11.6% in Fort washington.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Fort washington at 9.6% compared to 7.5% in Culver city.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Culver city at 16.5% compared to 12.0% in Fort washington.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Fort washington at 37.7% compared to 24.1% in Culver city.
  • Disability percentages are the same in both Fort washington and Culver city at 9.0%.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Fort washington Culver city
No Schooling 1.2% (297) 1.3% (501)
High School Diploma 14.4% (3,710) 7.6% (3,000)
Less than High School 8.3% (2,138) 9.1% (3,605)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 31.8% (8,208) 49.0% (19,344)

Education Levels Comparison: Fort washington vs Culver city

  • In Culver city, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 1.2% in Fort washington.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Fort washington hold a high school diploma at 14.4% compared to 7.6% in Culver city.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Culver city at 9.1%, compared to 8.3% in Fort washington.
  • In Culver city, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 49.0% compared to 31.8% in Fort washington.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.