Demographics details for Fort smith, AR vs Union city, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fort smith, AR vs Union city, GA.
| Data | Fort smith | Union city |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 89,992 | 27,895 |
| Median Age | 36.4 years | 32.7 years |
| Median Income | $50,799 | $46,696 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 17.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 16% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.7 | 6.1 |
Population Comparison: Fort smith vs Union city
- In Fort smith, the population is higher at 89,992, compared to 27,895 in Union city.
- Residents in Fort smith have a higher median age of 36.4 years compared to 32.7 years in Union city.
- Fort smith has a higher median income of $50,799 compared to $46,696 in Union city.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Fort smith at 36.0% compared to 17.0% in Union city.
- The poverty level is higher in Union city at 16%, compared to 12% in Fort smith.
- Union city has a higher unemployment rate at 6.1% compared to 3.7% in Fort smith.
Demographics
Demographics Fort smith vs Union city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fort smith | Union city |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 8 | 85 |
| White | 57 | 6 |
| Asian | 6 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 19 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 4 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fort smith vs Union city
- In Union city, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 85% compared to 8% in Fort smith.
- Fort smith has a higher percentage of White residents at 57% compared to 6% in Union city.
- The Asian population is larger in Fort smith at 6% compared to 0% in Union city.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Fort smith at 19% compared to 5% in Union city.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Fort smith at 9% compared to 4% in Union city.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Fort smith at 1% compared to 0% in Union city.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fort smith | Union city |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.6% | 16.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.7% | 12.2% |
| Depression | 27.8% | 17.2% |
| Smoking | 21.8% | 18.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.2% | 13.5% |
| Obesity | 39.5% | 36.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fort smith vs Union city
- More residents in Fort smith report poor mental health at 19.6% compared to 16.7% in Union city.
- Depression is more prevalent in Fort smith at 27.8% compared to 17.2% in Union city.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Fort smith at 21.8% compared to 18.0% in Union city.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Union city at 13.5% compared to 13.2% in Fort smith.
- Obesity rates are higher in Fort smith at 39.5% compared to 36.6% in Union city.
- Disability percentages are higher in Fort smith at 20.0% compared to 12.0% in Union city.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fort smith | Union city |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.3% (2,029) | 0.5% (129) |
| High School Diploma | 14.8% (13,356) | 13.2% (3,681) |
| Less than High School | 19.8% (17,822) | 7.8% (2,166) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.4% (14,745) | 17.3% (4,828) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fort smith vs Union city
- A higher percentage of residents in Fort smith have no formal schooling at 2.3% compared to 0.5% in Union city.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fort smith hold a high school diploma at 14.8% compared to 13.2% in Union city.
- More residents in Fort smith have less than a high school education at 19.8% compared to 7.8% in Union city.
- In Union city, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.3% compared to 16.4% in Fort smith.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.