Demographics details for Fort lupton, CO vs Union city, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fort lupton, CO vs Union city, CA.
| Data | Fort lupton | Union city |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 8,829 | 67,039 |
| Median Age | 35.9 years | 41.3 years |
| Median Income | $71,293 | $138,013 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 50.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.7 |
Population Comparison: Fort lupton vs Union city
- The population in Union city is higher at 67,039, compared to 8,829 in Fort lupton.
- The median age in Union city is higher at 41.3 years, compared to 35.9 years in Fort lupton.
- Union city has a higher median income of $138,013, compared to $71,293 in Fort lupton.
- In Union city, the percentage of married families is higher at 50.0%, compared to 34.0% in Fort lupton.
- Fort lupton has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 9% in Union city.
- Union city has a higher unemployment rate at 4.7% compared to 3.5% in Fort lupton.
Demographics
Demographics Fort lupton vs Union city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fort lupton | Union city |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 5 |
| White | 26 | 6 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 58 |
| Hispanic | 53 | 21 |
| Two or More Races | 20 | 9 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Fort lupton vs Union city
- In Union city, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 0% in Fort lupton.
- Fort lupton has a higher percentage of White residents at 26% compared to 6% in Union city.
- In Union city, the Asian population stands at 58%, greater than 0% in Fort lupton.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Fort lupton at 53% compared to 21% in Union city.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Fort lupton at 20% compared to 9% in Union city.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fort lupton and Union city at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fort lupton | Union city |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.8% | 12.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.8% | 8.0% |
| Depression | 19.9% | 13.9% |
| Smoking | 15.0% | 8.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.0% | 13.7% |
| Obesity | 30.2% | 21.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fort lupton vs Union city
- More residents in Fort lupton report poor mental health at 15.8% compared to 12.8% in Union city.
- Depression is more prevalent in Fort lupton at 19.9% compared to 13.9% in Union city.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Fort lupton at 15.0% compared to 8.6% in Union city.
- Binge drinking is more common in Fort lupton at 17.0% compared to 13.7% in Union city.
- Obesity rates are higher in Fort lupton at 30.2% compared to 21.7% in Union city.
- Disability percentages are higher in Fort lupton at 12.0% compared to 9.0% in Union city.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fort lupton | Union city |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.6% (145) | 2.7% (1,812) |
| High School Diploma | 16.2% (1,428) | 14.2% (9,499) |
| Less than High School | 28.0% (2,476) | 15.3% (10,264) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.0% (622) | 34.7% (23,285) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fort lupton vs Union city
- In Union city, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 1.6% in Fort lupton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fort lupton hold a high school diploma at 16.2% compared to 14.2% in Union city.
- More residents in Fort lupton have less than a high school education at 28.0% compared to 15.3% in Union city.
- In Union city, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 34.7% compared to 7.0% in Fort lupton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.