Demographics details for Fort calhoun, NE vs Junction city, KS

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Fort calhoun, NE vs Junction city, KS.

Data Fort calhoun Junction city
Population 1,115 22,264
Median Age 44.1 years 28.5 years
Median Income $75,900 $60,709
Married Families 40.0% 40.0%
Poverty Level 8% 13%
Unemployment Rate 2.5 4.8

Population Comparison: Fort calhoun vs Junction city

  • The population in Junction city is higher at 22,264, compared to 1,115 in Fort calhoun.
  • Residents in Fort calhoun have a higher median age of 44.1 years compared to 28.5 years in Junction city.
  • Fort calhoun has a higher median income of $75,900 compared to $60,709 in Junction city.
  • The percentage of married families is the same in both Fort calhoun and Junction city at 40.0%.
  • The poverty level is higher in Junction city at 13%, compared to 8% in Fort calhoun.
  • Junction city has a higher unemployment rate at 4.8% compared to 2.5% in Fort calhoun.

Demographics

Demographics Fort calhoun vs Junction city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Fort calhoun Junction city
Black 1 20
White 85 43
Asian Data is updating 3
Hispanic 6 18
Two or More Races 8 15
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Fort calhoun vs Junction city

  • In Junction city, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 20% compared to 1% in Fort calhoun.
  • Fort calhoun has a higher percentage of White residents at 85% compared to 43% in Junction city.
  • In Junction city, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in Fort calhoun.
  • Junction city has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 18%, compared to 6% in Fort calhoun.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Junction city at 15%, compared to 8% in Fort calhoun.
  • In Junction city, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Fort calhoun.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Fort calhoun Junction city
Mental Health Not Good 12.3% 17.1%
Physical Health Not Good 7.7% 11.0%
Depression 15.3% 19.2%
Smoking 14.0% 18.5%
Binge Drinking 22.1% 16.6%
Obesity 33.3% 41.8%
Disability Percentage 12.0% 16.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Fort calhoun vs Junction city

  • In Junction city, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.1% compared to 12.3% in Fort calhoun.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Junction city at 19.2% versus 15.3% in Fort calhoun.
  • Junction city has a higher smoking rate at 18.5% compared to 14.0% in Fort calhoun.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Fort calhoun at 22.1% compared to 16.6% in Junction city.
  • Junction city has higher obesity rates at 41.8% compared to 33.3% in Fort calhoun.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Junction city at 16.0% compared to 12.0% in Fort calhoun.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Fort calhoun Junction city
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 1.0% (216)
High School Diploma 33.7% (376) 12.4% (2,755)
Less than High School 6.5% (72) 6.9% (1,535)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 14.4% (161) 13.2% (2,941)

Education Levels Comparison: Fort calhoun vs Junction city

  • In Junction city, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.0% in Fort calhoun.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Fort calhoun hold a high school diploma at 33.7% compared to 12.4% in Junction city.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Junction city at 6.9%, compared to 6.5% in Fort calhoun.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Fort calhoun hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.4% compared to 13.2% in Junction city.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.