Demographics details for Fort atkinson, WI vs Scottsdale, AZ

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Fort atkinson, WI vs Scottsdale, AZ.

Data Fort atkinson Scottsdale
Population 12,412 243,050
Median Age 42.0 years 48.4 years
Median Income $72,215 $104,197
Married Families 41.0% 44.0%
Poverty Level 9% 9%
Unemployment Rate 3.2 2.9

Population Comparison: Fort atkinson vs Scottsdale

  • The population in Scottsdale is higher at 243,050, compared to 12,412 in Fort atkinson.
  • The median age in Scottsdale is higher at 48.4 years, compared to 42.0 years in Fort atkinson.
  • Scottsdale has a higher median income of $104,197, compared to $72,215 in Fort atkinson.
  • In Scottsdale, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 41.0% in Fort atkinson.
  • The poverty level is identical in both Fort atkinson and Scottsdale at 9%.
  • The unemployment rate in Fort atkinson is higher at 3.2%, compared to 2.9% in Scottsdale.

Demographics

Demographics Fort atkinson vs Scottsdale provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Fort atkinson Scottsdale
Black Data is updating 2
White 89 75
Asian Data is updating 5
Hispanic 8 10
Two or More Races 3 7
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Fort atkinson vs Scottsdale

  • In Scottsdale, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 0% in Fort atkinson.
  • Fort atkinson has a higher percentage of White residents at 89% compared to 75% in Scottsdale.
  • In Scottsdale, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 0% in Fort atkinson.
  • Scottsdale has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 10%, compared to 8% in Fort atkinson.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Scottsdale at 7%, compared to 3% in Fort atkinson.
  • In Scottsdale, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Fort atkinson.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Fort atkinson Scottsdale
Mental Health Not Good 15.2% 14.7%
Physical Health Not Good 10.2% 8.0%
Depression 23.6% 19.1%
Smoking 16.0% 10.2%
Binge Drinking 23.5% 19.3%
Obesity 34.0% 26.5%
Disability Percentage 12.0% 9.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Fort atkinson vs Scottsdale

  • More residents in Fort atkinson report poor mental health at 15.2% compared to 14.7% in Scottsdale.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Fort atkinson at 23.6% compared to 19.1% in Scottsdale.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Fort atkinson at 16.0% compared to 10.2% in Scottsdale.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Fort atkinson at 23.5% compared to 19.3% in Scottsdale.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Fort atkinson at 34.0% compared to 26.5% in Scottsdale.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Fort atkinson at 12.0% compared to 9.0% in Scottsdale.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Fort atkinson Scottsdale
No Schooling 1.3% (160) 0.5% (1,157)
High School Diploma 20.8% (2,578) 7.7% (18,770)
Less than High School 12.9% (1,595) 4.0% (9,724)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 19.6% (2,436) 47.7% (116,035)

Education Levels Comparison: Fort atkinson vs Scottsdale

  • A higher percentage of residents in Fort atkinson have no formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.5% in Scottsdale.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Fort atkinson hold a high school diploma at 20.8% compared to 7.7% in Scottsdale.
  • More residents in Fort atkinson have less than a high school education at 12.9% compared to 4.0% in Scottsdale.
  • In Scottsdale, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 47.7% compared to 19.6% in Fort atkinson.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.