Demographics details for Fort atkinson, WI vs Parker, CO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fort atkinson, WI vs Parker, CO.
| Data | Fort atkinson | Parker |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 12,412 | 61,222 |
| Median Age | 42.0 years | 35.7 years |
| Median Income | $72,215 | $126,615 |
| Married Families | 41.0% | 45.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.9 |
Population Comparison: Fort atkinson vs Parker
- The population in Parker is higher at 61,222, compared to 12,412 in Fort atkinson.
- Residents in Fort atkinson have a higher median age of 42.0 years compared to 35.7 years in Parker.
- Parker has a higher median income of $126,615, compared to $72,215 in Fort atkinson.
- In Parker, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 41.0% in Fort atkinson.
- Fort atkinson has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 5% in Parker.
- Parker has a higher unemployment rate at 3.9% compared to 3.2% in Fort atkinson.
Demographics
Demographics Fort atkinson vs Parker provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fort atkinson | Parker |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 2 |
| White | 89 | 73 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 5 |
| Hispanic | 8 | 12 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 8 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fort atkinson vs Parker
- In Parker, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 0% in Fort atkinson.
- Fort atkinson has a higher percentage of White residents at 89% compared to 73% in Parker.
- In Parker, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 0% in Fort atkinson.
- Parker has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 12%, compared to 8% in Fort atkinson.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Parker at 8%, compared to 3% in Fort atkinson.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fort atkinson and Parker at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fort atkinson | Parker |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.2% | 12.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.2% | 8.1% |
| Depression | 23.6% | 19.2% |
| Smoking | 16.0% | 9.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 23.5% | 18.9% |
| Obesity | 34.0% | 23.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 5.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fort atkinson vs Parker
- More residents in Fort atkinson report poor mental health at 15.2% compared to 12.9% in Parker.
- Depression is more prevalent in Fort atkinson at 23.6% compared to 19.2% in Parker.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Fort atkinson at 16.0% compared to 9.8% in Parker.
- Binge drinking is more common in Fort atkinson at 23.5% compared to 18.9% in Parker.
- Obesity rates are higher in Fort atkinson at 34.0% compared to 23.7% in Parker.
- Disability percentages are higher in Fort atkinson at 12.0% compared to 5.0% in Parker.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fort atkinson | Parker |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.3% (160) | 0.7% (432) |
| High School Diploma | 20.8% (2,578) | 6.8% (4,185) |
| Less than High School | 12.9% (1,595) | 4.4% (2,679) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.6% (2,436) | 32.8% (20,066) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fort atkinson vs Parker
- A higher percentage of residents in Fort atkinson have no formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.7% in Parker.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fort atkinson hold a high school diploma at 20.8% compared to 6.8% in Parker.
- More residents in Fort atkinson have less than a high school education at 12.9% compared to 4.4% in Parker.
- In Parker, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 32.8% compared to 19.6% in Fort atkinson.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.